logo 
spacer
  

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

If you have an opinion, you should share it! Register Now!

America's Debate hosts the best in news, government, and political debate. Register now to take part in the most civil and constructive debate on the Internet. Join the community, and get ready to be challenged!

Click here to start

> Sponsored Links

Register to remove these ads!

> Welcome to the America's Debate Archive!

Topics that have had no new replies in the last 180 days are moved to the archive.

New replies are not accepted once a topic is moved to the archive, and new topics cannot be started in the archive.

> Is the US losing in Afghanistan too?, Riot in Kabul and other problems
TedN5
post May 29 2006, 06:57 PM
Post #1


********
Millennium Mark

Group: Members
Posts: 1,947
Member No.: 4,454
Joined: February-3-05

From: Olympia, Washington
Gender: Male
Politics: Very Liberal
Party affiliation: Undisclosed



The CIA expert on al Qaeda, Michael Scheuer, writing as "Anonymous" when he wrote Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror in 2004, predicted that the West would be unable to establish any government in Afghanistan other than a weak Islamist one and to attempt to do otherwise was folly. Since the invasion elections have been held but the central government's authority doesn't extend much beyond Kabul where foreign troops support its control. Much of the country has remained dominated by war lords and the growing of poppies and production of heroin for export has flourished. In the Southeast the Taliban has reemerged as a significant force. Now a major armed riot has taken place in Kabul directed at Americans and foreigners generally.

QUOTE
Today in Kabul the veneer of national progress was ripped off, leaving several Afghanis dead and many more wounded and sending this capital city into a lockdown. Four and a half years after the US-led military offensive successfully overthrew the Taliban government, which was protecting Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda, Kabul has erupted in gunfire, leaving citizens shattered and their confidence in the future shaken.
(See this Truthout Article).

QUOTE
The insurgency has intensified each year since 2001. Many analysts and even some officials agree widespread government corruption is a root cause, causing disillusion among local people and hamstringing development.
(See Yahoo Article).

1. Is Afghanistan slipping back into a failed state status?

2. Was it a strategic blunder not to stabilize Afghanistan before committing forces elsewhere?

3. What is the best course of action from the point forward?



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 1)
VDemosthenes
post May 29 2006, 07:08 PM
Post #2


*******
Five Hundred Club

Group: Members
Posts: 800
Member No.: 4,252
Joined: January-11-05

From: St. Augustine, Florida
Gender: Male
Politics: Moderate
Party affiliation: Libertarian



QUOTE(TedN5 @ May 29 2006, 01:57 PM)
1. Is Afghanistan slipping back into a failed state status?

2. Was it a strategic blunder not to stabilize Afghanistan before committing forces elsewhere?

3. What is the best course of action from the point forward?
*



1.) Can something slip back into something when it was never out of it? Afghanistan has always been unstable and this latest piece of news sheds just how unstable it actually is. Though one nation, the government only has so much control over the people. That alone is a hallmark of failure.

2.) Whether strategic or not, I think history is going to remember it as a blunder. We did the same thing to Afghanistan we have done in Iraq- remove the leader(s) and change the government. President Bush may have done this as a model to judge what success in Iraq would take, but quite honestly I doubt he really is that smart.

3.) Pulling troops from other assignments. Make our military installations around the globe operational on minimal or volunteer power and redeploy the thousands of troops in countries like Germany and Japan to Iraq or Afghanistan. It is counterproductive for terrorists to be profiting in other portions of an occupied nation, so we may as well just go in and put troops there to reduce that threat.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

  
Go to the top of the page - Simple Version Time is now: June 21st, 2018 - 09:38 PM
©2002-2010 America's Debate, Inc.  All rights reserved.