logo 
spacer
  

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

If you have an opinion, you should share it! Register Now!

America's Debate hosts the best in news, government, and political debate. Register now to take part in the most civil and constructive debate on the Internet. Join the community, and get ready to be challenged!

Click here to start

> Sponsored Links

Register to remove these ads!

> Welcome to the America's Debate Archive!

Topics that have had no new replies in the last 180 days are moved to the archive.

New replies are not accepted once a topic is moved to the archive, and new topics cannot be started in the archive.

> Sigh, another corrupt Rep Congresscritter ...
Bikerdad
post May 12 2006, 10:23 PM
Post #1


*********
Advanced Senior Contributor

Group: Members
Posts: 2,834
Member No.: 715
Joined: May-8-03

Gender: Male
Politics: Undisclosed
Party affiliation: Undisclosed



Chairman of Congressional Black Caucus knee deep in bribery scandal.

Hah! "Rep", as in Representative, not "Rep" as in Republican. tongue.gif

Now, the interesting aspect of this pretty much "run of the mill" Congressional corruption story is how little coverage its gotten. With all the clang and clamor over Abramoff and the San Diego fella, you'd think maybe this guy would get some press as well. Not....

Okay, so the questions for debate are two:

1) How much, if anything, have you heard about this scandal before, and from what media sources?

2) What accounts for the apparent paucity of coverage?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Start new topic
Replies (20 - 22)
Amlord
post May 22 2006, 06:44 PM
Post #21


Group Icon

**********
The Roaring Lion

Sponsor

Group: Moderators
Posts: 5,884
Member No.: 572
Joined: March-4-03

From: Cleveland suburbs, OH
Gender: Male
Politics: Conservative
Party affiliation: Republican



Lesly,

My point was that Mollohan was holding up investigations so that his party could use this as an election issue. "Climate of corruption" remember?

Although Mollohan made a big stink about the Ethics Committee amendment which could have allowed the Majority party (or the ranking Minority member) to block investigations, once those restrictions were lifted the Committee did not meet for almost six months. When they did meet, the Committee could only agree to revive the ten year old investigation of Jim McDermott.

Now that Mollohan is gone, the process is back to working again. Mollohan, in my view, was the problem and now we may know why...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AuthorMusician
post May 22 2006, 07:45 PM
Post #22


**********
Glasses and journalism work for me.

Sponsor
November 2003

Group: Sponsors
Posts: 6,393
Member No.: 297
Joined: December-1-02

From: Blueberry Hill
Gender: Male
Politics: Liberal
Party affiliation: Democrat



1) How much, if anything, have you heard about this scandal before, and from what media sources?

Local and national ABC morning news covered it. That's what I watch over coffee and guitar practice.

2) What accounts for the apparent paucity of coverage?

BD, if you haven't figured it out by now, it is your personal perception of reality that accounts for the apparent paucity of coverage. Very little research has proven the perception to be erroneous, unless you care to refute the findings.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ted
post May 23 2006, 05:10 PM
Post #23


***********
Ten Thousand Club

Sponsor
February 2007

Group: Sponsors
Posts: 11,416
Member No.: 1,807
Joined: November-20-03

From: Mass.
Gender: Male
Politics: Conservative
Party affiliation: Independent



QUOTE
Vermillion
Ted, you're just straight up, plain and simple wrong here. Everyone is telling you the same thing, this received quite wide media coverage, as wide as it deserved.

A minute on Google will give you multiple Washington post articles, FOXnews articles, ABC reporting, several MSNBC stories, and dozens of smaller newpapers and outlets taking it off the wire.


You know there is a difference between FRONT page big play stories and ones that get page 10 mention once and then die. Here is a new one (Democrat crook).
Lets see how mush air and print space it gets.

Bribery allegedly caught on tape
Court filing says congressman hid cash in freezer
By Allan Lengel By Matthew Barakat, Associated Press |
May 22, 2006
WASHINGTON -- US Representative William Jefferson, the subject of a 14-month bribery investigation, was videotaped accepting $100,000 in $100 bills from a Virginia investor who was wearing an FBI wire, according to an affidavit released yesterday.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washingt...caught_on_tape/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

  
Go to the top of the page - Simple Version Time is now: December 4th, 2021 - 07:28 AM
©2002-2010 America's Debate, Inc.  All rights reserved.