logo 
spacer
  

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

If you have an opinion, you should share it! Register Now!

America's Debate hosts the best in news, government, and political debate. Register now to take part in the most civil and constructive debate on the Internet. Join the community, and get ready to be challenged!

Click here to start

> Sponsored Links

Register to remove these ads!
> Who will be president in 2008?, Or, fun will the new poll system.
Presedent Predictions 2008
Who will win the Republican Presidential nomination in 2008?
John McCain [ 21 ] ** [32.81%]
Jeb Bush [ 5 ] ** [7.81%]
Rudolph Giuliani [ 15 ] ** [23.44%]
Condoleeza Rice [ 5 ] ** [7.81%]
Mitt Romney [ 5 ] ** [7.81%]
Bill Frist [ 1 ] ** [1.56%]
Newt Gingrich [ 2 ] ** [3.12%]
George Allen [ 3 ] ** [4.69%]
other [ 7 ] ** [10.94%]
Who will win the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2008?
Hillary Clinton [ 21 ] ** [32.81%]
Al Gore [ 9 ] ** [14.06%]
John Edwards [ 7 ] ** [10.94%]
Barak Obama [ 4 ] ** [6.25%]
John Kerry [ 3 ] ** [4.69%]
Russ Feingold [ 3 ] ** [4.69%]
Bill Richardson [ 4 ] ** [6.25%]
Joseph Biden [ 3 ] ** [4.69%]
other [ 10 ] ** [15.62%]
Who will become president in 2009?
John McCain [ 14 ] ** [21.88%]
Jeb Bush [ 1 ] ** [1.56%]
Rudolph Giuliani [ 10 ] ** [15.62%]
Condoleeza Rice [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Hillary Clinton [ 10 ] ** [15.62%]
Al Gore [ 4 ] ** [6.25%]
John Edwards [ 2 ] ** [3.12%]
Barak Obama [ 3 ] ** [4.69%]
other [ 20 ] ** [31.25%]
Total Votes: 73
  
Eeyore
post Jun 18 2006, 02:06 PM
Post #1


Group Icon

********
Thaaaaanks for noticin' me

Sponsor
February 2003

Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,498
Member No.: 365
Joined: December-28-02

From: Nashville
Gender: Male
Politics: Liberal
Party affiliation: Democrat



I was trying to make this poll only.

For comments let's just stick with names for your other votes and watch the results.

This post has been edited by Eeyore: Jun 18 2006, 06:37 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
Blackstone
post Jun 18 2006, 02:49 PM
Post #2


*********
Advanced Senior Contributor

Group: Members
Posts: 2,995
Member No.: 5,539
Joined: October-13-05

Gender: Male
Politics: Undisclosed
Party affiliation: Independent



I put down "other" in the Repubican field: Mike Pence. There are enough people on the Right who are up-in-arms over the GOP's free-spending ways to make it happen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jaime
post Jun 18 2006, 04:38 PM
Post #3


Group Icon

**********
Elite Senior Contributor

Group: Admin
Posts: 5,941
Member No.: 4
Joined: July-25-02

From: Down where the River meets the Sea
Gender: Female
Politics: Independent
Party affiliation: None



I went with 'other' in the Dems category - Mark Warner. thumbsup.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BoF
post Jun 19 2006, 06:19 AM
Post #4


**********
Giga-bite: "I catch mice & rats - 2 & 4 legs."

Sponsor
October 2004

Group: Sponsors
Posts: 6,128
Member No.: 3,423
Joined: August-14-04

From: Texas
Gender: Male
Politics: Liberal
Party affiliation: Democrat



I voted "other" in all three categories.

I agree with Jaime on Mark Warner thumbsup.gif and think he might have the best chance at winning the general election.

While we're talking about Republican long shots, my conservative friend from the coffee shop thinks Tom Tancredo, R- Colorado, has a chance, especially with the anti-immigration crowd.

I seriously doubt Rep.Tancredo has a ghost of a chance, but we might as well throw him in there with Rep. Mike Pence, R- Indiana.

This post has been edited by BoF: Jun 19 2006, 06:23 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Argonaut
post Jun 19 2006, 06:33 AM
Post #5


******
Senior Contributor

Group: Members
Posts: 253
Member No.: 2,263
Joined: January-23-04

From: State of Jefferson
Gender: Male
Politics: Independent
Party affiliation: Libertarian



Without stating my personal preference, I think Rudy has a very good chance at being our next President. From the poll results so far, I see I am not alone.

On the other hand...the predictable 18 months of shameless and bloodthirsty political warfare we are all about to witness from both (or all) sides (beyond what we have seen so far) should at least make it the kind of "edge of your seat" spellbinder we have all come to expect every November...The very future of the human race depends on it...Right? sleeping.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Amlord
post Jun 19 2006, 12:45 PM
Post #6


Group Icon

**********
The Roaring Lion

Sponsor

Group: Moderators
Posts: 5,884
Member No.: 572
Joined: March-4-03

From: Cleveland suburbs, OH
Gender: Male
Politics: Conservative
Party affiliation: Republican



I voted that at this point I would think George Allen has the inside track on the Republican nomination. Rudy is simply not socially conservative enough to get the nomination, no matter how popular he is (or was) in the general election.

For the Democrats, I went with Russ Feingold. He seems to be a consensus builder.

I voted other for who will be President, since my inputs are probably wrong and I always stick by the GIGO theory.

This post has been edited by Amlord: Jun 19 2006, 12:47 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Just Leave me Al...
post Jun 20 2006, 04:18 AM
Post #7


*******
Five Hundred Club

Group: Members
Posts: 508
Member No.: 4,594
Joined: March-1-05

Gender: Male
Politics: Independent
Party affiliation: Independent



I'm with Amlord on George Allen. As much as I would love to see McCain pull it off, I just think there is too much power and money that will do whatever it takes to ensure that he loses.

As for the Democrat ticket, who knows? Probably someone I've never heard of. The thing is, I think a no name would take out a Frist or an Allen in the general.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fontbleau
post Jun 21 2006, 04:59 AM
Post #8


***
Junior Contributor

Group: Members
Posts: 34
Member No.: 5,217
Joined: July-3-05

From: southeast Michigan
Gender: Male
Politics: Independent
Party affiliation: None



I've felt since before the last election that '08 would involve Hillary vs. Condi.

It seems remote now, but I'll bet the frontrunners won't look as attractive after a year of partisan attacks.

Another prediction: Organizations and so-called "values" will trump policy on Election Day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wertz
post Jun 21 2006, 07:19 AM
Post #9


Group Icon

*********
Advanced Senior

Sponsor
January 2003

Group: Committee Members
Posts: 3,235
Member No.: 181
Joined: October-23-02

From: Franklinville PA
Gender: Male
Politics: Liberal
Party affiliation: None



I voted yesterday and am commenting today and must admit I don't even remember who I voted for. blush.gif Then again, it's a pretty undistinguished field. I think McCain could win, if nominated (though I doubt he will be). On the other hand, I think an Al Gore/Wesley Clark ticket would be tough for any Republican to beat - at least, fairly - though I doubt Gore will go forward.

I don't think either Rudi Giuliani or Hillary Clinton would have a snowflake's chance in hell of winning a national election - and I seriously doubt either will be their party's choice. In fact, I doubt Hillary will even enter the race. Despite all the punditry of the past couple of years, I think she's quite happy being one of New York's senators - as she has stated at every possible opportunity.

In terms of ideal candidates, whatever happened to Colin Powell? Wasn't he once the GOP's Great White Hope, so to speak? And, in terms of the Democrats, why is no one mentioning Evan Bayh?

Ultimately, I'm leaning toward Amlord's choices - I think it could actually be between Allen and Feingold.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CruisingRam
post Jun 21 2006, 08:17 AM
Post #10


**********
Elite Senior Contributor

Group: Members
Posts: 7,934
Member No.: 927
Joined: July-25-03

From: Hawaii
Gender: Male
Politics: Liberal
Party affiliation: Other



My guess for dem nominee this early is Bill Richardson and Barak Obama as VP

Repub, possibly McCain with the conservative base finally starting to understand that they didn't nominate a real conservative last time LOL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
phaedrus
post Jun 26 2006, 04:39 PM
Post #11


*******
Five Hundred Club

Group: Members
Posts: 571
Member No.: 1,175
Joined: September-10-03

From: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Gender: Male
Politics: Slightly Conservative
Party affiliation: Democrat



Evan Bayh is who I am expecting to both win the Dem. nomination and the Presidential election. I can't believe that Kerry and Gore are even in the pole, I don't think Gore will even run and Kerry is unelectable. Hilary Clinton is an interesting possibility to vice president but she was probably used to more influence when she was in the White House last time.

This post has been edited by phaedrus: Jun 26 2006, 04:45 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
inventor
post Aug 4 2006, 04:33 AM
Post #12


*******
Five Hundred Club

Group: Members
Posts: 516
Member No.: 5,197
Joined: June-28-05

From: nevada
Gender: Male
Politics: Very Liberal
Party affiliation: Democrat





I would love a Condi-Barak showdown. I think this would be a first class show and clean. But there is no stopping McCain, he has done all the right things with the powers that need be.

This post has been edited by inventor: Aug 4 2006, 04:37 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Blackstone
post Aug 4 2006, 07:36 PM
Post #13


*********
Advanced Senior Contributor

Group: Members
Posts: 2,995
Member No.: 5,539
Joined: October-13-05

Gender: Male
Politics: Undisclosed
Party affiliation: Independent



QUOTE(inventor @ Aug 4 2006, 12:33 AM) *
But there is no stopping McCain, he has done all the right things with the powers that need be.

All the powers that need be, except the GOP's conservative base. They're after his head right now, partly for his speech-rationing bill (McCain-Feingold), partly for the detainee treatment act, and mostly for his joining up with Ted Kennedy to legalize illegal aliens on a massive scale. His playing footsie with John Kerry in '04 didn't help matters either.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
gordo
post Aug 5 2006, 03:45 AM
Post #14


*******
Five Hundred Club

Group: Members
Posts: 864
Member No.: 6,220
Joined: June-28-06

Gender: Male
Politics: Independent
Party affiliation: Independent



Hillary will not run, or if she does she will not win. Its not that politics is simply old rich white men I just do not think giving her past along with the current world situation that should would ever win. Maybe the election after this with a different environment to run in she might. Al Gore would be nice, not simply just because he is pro environmental but because he has in my opinion a level head overall, he does not seem to react to panic to easily or get crushed under stress, even as the election he ran for president in was being corrupted openly he did not lash out, I respect that, he is also pretty moderate overall save for some minor aspects, he would have more of a chance too taking a conservative democrat as a v.p, though I do not know who that would be, it will be pretty hard to the republicans to escape a lot of mistakes this administration has committed, lets just hope that the dems dont lose that, yes lesser of two evils in my eyes is the democrats.

As for the republican side, I have no real clue. Most the people named can be connected in one way or another to a lot of woes the US is currently seeing, many more people might simply become more politically active because of costs at the pump while subsidized oil companies bring in record profits, or Katrina, Iraq, the list could go on really, stem cells, the environment. Its going to be hard. They in my opinion should attempt to work from there strengths of course, the pro war crowd and the religious right, that would be key for them to win and I dont see many names up there that will not have both of such as I described working against them or not fully for them in one way or another, more so then in the past America has become charged with all sorts of tension, it will probably come to play out this election more so then in past ones. If the repubs kept the war on terror better then it currently is it would play in there favor highly, but its simply not looking that way, and I think not only in the ranks of repubs but in the democrats of course this will become a focal point, or simply they might destroy there own chances to win. Who knows how much attention terrorists pay to American politics, maybe people should not have been so complacent and loud with their plans.

So my bet is Al Gore with a conservative democrat as v.p.

As for pubs, I would say john McCain with a supporting cast the gain more support in repub voting blocks he may be weak with.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Christopher
post Aug 5 2006, 04:40 AM
Post #15


********
Millennium Mark

Group: Members
Posts: 1,352
Member No.: 1,696
Joined: November-9-03

From: Phoenix AZ
Gender: Male
Politics: Independent
Party affiliation: Private



The Dems would do well to consider Bayh
Rudy has baggage out the tushy and would get slaughtered
Clinton hasn't a shot. actually she could get the nomination and would precide over a landslide loss--no one actually likes her

McCain could definetely win without the right fringe if he got nominated. Hell he is the only big name politician whose kids are actvely military--his son just enlisted in the Marines.
He has served and is not afraid to buck his party when need be. He could grab a hell of a lot of moderates and centrists--he doesnt need the CC fringe.

Personally I would love McCain/Bayh Unity 08
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Amlord
post Aug 25 2006, 02:49 PM
Post #16


Group Icon

**********
The Roaring Lion

Sponsor

Group: Moderators
Posts: 5,884
Member No.: 572
Joined: March-4-03

From: Cleveland suburbs, OH
Gender: Male
Politics: Conservative
Party affiliation: Republican



Don't forget how old McCain is. He will be 72 when the elections roll around in November 2008, making him three years older than Reagan was when he was re-elected. The last two Presidents have been 46 and 54 when elected. (It's hard to believe that W is 60 years old now).

I like McCain. He is much more conservative than his critics give him credit for or his supporters admit. His age could be a serious problem for his candidacy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
drewyorktimes
post Aug 30 2006, 11:23 PM
Post #17


******
Senior Contributor

Group: Members
Posts: 394
Member No.: 3,417
Joined: August-14-04

From: New York
Gender: Male
Politics: Liberal
Party affiliation: Democrat



In a reasonable world, I'm saying Biden vs. Mccain/Guiliani.

But in the world we live in, Godzilla vs. Hillary Clinton in a stovepipe hat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BoF
post Oct 3 2006, 05:11 AM
Post #18


**********
Giga-bite: "I catch mice & rats - 2 & 4 legs."

Sponsor
October 2004

Group: Sponsors
Posts: 6,128
Member No.: 3,423
Joined: August-14-04

From: Texas
Gender: Male
Politics: Liberal
Party affiliation: Democrat



QUOTE
I voted that at this point I would think George Allen has the inside track on the Republican nomination.


I hate to break the news to you, but I think "macaca," etc. has blown George Allen out of the presidential pool now and forever. bye.gif

Even if he manages to keep his Virginia senate seat, he will not be a serious candidate in 2008. down.gif

It's a shame that we can't go back and change our votes in these polls. laugh.gif

Maybe we need to start a new one with a different list of candidates, including former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner. I would do so myself, but I haven't had much luck starting polls in the new board software. sad.gif

This post has been edited by BoF: Oct 3 2006, 05:59 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
smorpheus
post Oct 3 2006, 06:39 AM
Post #19


*****
Century Mark

Group: Members
Posts: 226
Member No.: 2,083
Joined: December-27-03

From: Santa Monica, CA
Gender: Male
Politics: Very Liberal
Party affiliation: Green Party



QUOTE(Amlord @ Aug 25 2006, 06:49 AM) *

Don't forget how old McCain is. He will be 72 when the elections roll around in November 2008, making him three years older than Reagan was when he was re-elected. The last two Presidents have been 46 and 54 when elected. (It's hard to believe that W is 60 years old now).

I like McCain. He is much more conservative than his critics give him credit for or his supporters admit. His age could be a serious problem for his candidacy.


I agree age has been a factor, and it was even a factor when he ran against Bush. He had a couple of really bad years there where he had skin cancer, and just was looking generally unhealthy. The last 4 years or so though he's looked incredibly strong and stalwart. I dont' think 76 is too old for him to be running even in 2012, as he certainly is more coherent than Reagen was at his age. However, I think only a couple of months later we are already starting to see new possibilities emerge.

Regardless, unless it's McCain, Obama or an equally free-thinking candidate, I'll be voting Green.

This post has been edited by smorpheus: Oct 3 2006, 06:40 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Amlord
post Oct 3 2006, 01:33 PM
Post #20


Group Icon

**********
The Roaring Lion

Sponsor

Group: Moderators
Posts: 5,884
Member No.: 572
Joined: March-4-03

From: Cleveland suburbs, OH
Gender: Male
Politics: Conservative
Party affiliation: Republican



QUOTE(BoF @ Oct 3 2006, 01:11 AM) *

QUOTE
I voted that at this point I would think George Allen has the inside track on the Republican nomination.


I hate to break the news to you, but I think "macaca," etc. has blown George Allen out of the presidential pool now and forever. bye.gif

Even if he manages to keep his Virginia senate seat, he will not be a serious candidate in 2008. down.gif

It's a shame that we can't go back and change our votes in these polls. laugh.gif

Maybe we need to start a new one with a different list of candidates, including former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner. I would do so myself, but I haven't had much luck starting polls in the new board software. sad.gif


I'll stick with my George Allen prediction, thank you very much.

Macaca notwithstanding, Allen is a great speaker, a personable guy, and not a racist. Of course, in politics, perception is reality, so who knows?

It is certainly not outside of standard Democratic strategy to denigrate someone by misrepresenting what they said or what they really meant.

Allen will win handily (at least a ten point spread, 55-45) in Virginia next month: another prediction by yours truly. He has a huge amount of money, is nice looking (a factor many do not figure into the equation), is the incumbent, and Virginia is a red state. Not to mention his opponent (Jim Webb) has written a book which used the "n word" many times and is endorsed by Hillary Clinton ( biggrin.gif ). His main strengths are being a Vietnam vet, a best selling author and being Secretary of the Navy under Reagan. His website, however, reads like a John Kerry ad (I fought in Vietnam and will continue to fight...).

Were I Allen, I would pound Webb on his racist and anti-women comments:

QUOTE
“And I have never met a woman, including the dozens of female midshipmen I encountered during my recent semester as a professor at the Naval Academy, whom I would trust to provide those men with combat leadership.” (pg. 148, “Women Can’t Fight,” Washingtonian Magazine, November 1979)


QUOTE
“Tailhook should have been a three or maybe five-day story.” (Speech to the Naval Institute Annual Conference, Washington Times, 4/25/96)


and those that he runs with:
QUOTE
An informal group calling themselves “Webbites” shamelessly practices bigotry. Adherents of James Webb, former secretary of the Navy who in a visit to the Naval Academy several years ago referred to female midshipmen as “Thunder Things,” this group has evolved over the past decade from a collection of outspoken critics of women in the military to a secret society, one that in 1991 referred to itself as the “WUBA KLUX KLAN” and solicited new members to further its goal of ridding the Naval Academy of women.” (The New Republic, 8/17/92)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

  
Go to the top of the page - Simple Version Time is now: January 29th, 2022 - 11:27 AM
©2002-2010 America's Debate, Inc.  All rights reserved.