|
|
|
America's Debate Radio - 235th Live Edition: Sep 17 2010, 09:00 PM EST.
Stream or Download the newest show | Subscribe to the podcast: iTunes · RSS
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dec 20 2003, 12:08 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Senior Contributor January 2004 Group: Sponsors Posts: 298 Member No.: 1,933 Joined: December-4-03 From: Jersey City, NJ Gender: Female Politics: Independent Party affiliation: Independent |
Libya Agrees to Dismantle WMD Program
QUOTE Blair said Britain and the United States had been talking with Libya for nine months, after negotiating a settlement in the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am jet over Lockerbie, Scotland that killed 270 people. Libya made the overture, hoping to resolve its weapons program "in a similarly cooperative manner," Blair said in Durham, Britain. QUOTE The U.N. Security Council ended sanctions against Libya on Sept. 12 after Gadhafi's government took responsibility for the Pan Am bombing and agreed to pay $2.7 billion to the victims' families. But the United States has kept its own 17-year embargo in place. Washington has said Libya was actively developing biological and chemical weapons, upgrading its nuclear capabilities and seeking ballistic missiles to deliver weapons of mass destruction, working with the help of countries that sponsor terrorism. Tony Blair and Bush QUOTE The decision entitled Libya to rejoin the international community, Mr Blair said. If Libya follows through, Bush said, "its good faith can be returned." He said the United States and Britain would make sure Libya kept its word, given its "troubled history," but he added, "As we have found with other nations, old hostilities do not need to go on forever." Questions for Debate: 1. Do you think the war on Iraq had a significant influence on Libya’s decision? Given the time line (around March 2003) that they started talks about dismantling? 2. Should the US end its own sanctions against Libya? Is dismantling WMD’s enough of a reason to end sanctions or do they also need to prove that they are no longer sponsoring or helping terrorists? 3. Should the fact that Gadhafi is a dictator factor into our reasons? This post has been edited by dreampiper: Dec 20 2003, 12:42 AM |
|
|
|
DreamPipEr Libya Agrees to Dismantle WMD Program Dec 20 2003, 12:08 AM
Venom 1. Yes I believe our action in Iraq persuaded Gadh... Dec 20 2003, 12:38 AM
GoAmerica
Yes. Seeing as we were undoubtfully going to win ... Dec 20 2003, 12:47 AM
Ultimatejoe Wow, there's a whole lot of misconceptions fly... Dec 20 2003, 04:29 AM
Beladonna 1. Do you think the war on Iraq had a significant ... Dec 21 2003, 12:05 PM
Passion51 Libya was mentioned months ago as one of the first... Dec 21 2003, 01:25 PM
GoAmerica
Yep. Now if Iran, North Korea and Syria would fol... Dec 21 2003, 04:37 PM
Julian 1. I am sure that the Iraq invasion didn't hur... Dec 21 2003, 05:24 PM
DreamPipEr I agree that Libya has been trying to get away fro... Dec 21 2003, 07:28 PM
GoAmerica Here is something new. This might be the real reas... Dec 21 2003, 09:53 PM
Venom
After the last Telegraph article on a Atta-Iraq ... Dec 21 2003, 09:58 PM
Passion51
After the last Telegraph article on a Atta-Iraq ... Dec 21 2003, 11:02 PM
Venom
Sure can.
Link #1 is the false story from the t... Dec 22 2003, 01:05 AM
nebraska29
I would've given the war more credit for Muam... Dec 23 2003, 09:08 AM
Beladonna
Tony Blair believes this to be directly related ... Dec 23 2003, 05:01 PM
Ultimatejoe So did he say this several years ago when he start... Dec 24 2003, 07:12 PM
Beladonna Well, "the Coalition" hasn't been in... Dec 24 2003, 10:07 PM
amf
I get why we tied our resolving the diplomatic si... Dec 28 2003, 04:34 PM
Mrs. Pigpen I think Libya has been extending the olive branch ... Dec 28 2003, 08:16 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Simple Version | Time is now: September 9th, 2010 - 01:03 PM |