|
|
|
America's Debate Radio - 234th Live Edition: Sep 8 2010, 09:00 PM EST.
Stream or Download the newest show | Subscribe to the podcast: iTunes · RSS
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Mar 16 2004, 03:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Advanced Senior Contributor Group: Members Posts: 2,547 Member No.: 2,065 Joined: December-23-03 From: Canada Gender: Male Politics: Slightly Liberal Party affiliation: Undisclosed |
In a somewhat quiet and understated move, the Government of China effectively ended one of the bastions of Communist rule in the country by enshrining in the Chinese constitution the right to private property.
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/03/15/world/china040315 Though it has been difficult to call China 'communist' in recent years with their market reforms, several of the primary pillars of the communiststate still existed. The absence of private property was probably the single most important, and had been identified by Mao himself as the hallmark of a communist state. China may well be the first country in the world to successfuly transition between communist and capitalist (all the while maintaining their oligarchy, mind you) Further, the enshrining od private property will make the country even more attractive to foreign investment. So the question of the day is, What is next for China? Will they be able to maintain their Oligarchy while moving over to a market economy state, and if they do, how long before they start to rival the US for superpower status? |
|
|
|
Vermillion End to Chinese Communism Mar 16 2004, 03:46 PM
Eeyore I think China is already the US's clear rival ... Mar 16 2004, 04:06 PM
GoAmerica
I don't think China will be able to convert t... Mar 16 2004, 06:14 PM
Eeyore
Just keep in mind that with four times the popula... Mar 16 2004, 06:50 PM
Titus
I'd have to say that the people of Tibet an... Mar 16 2004, 11:39 PM
amf
Just keep in mind that with four times the popula... Mar 17 2004, 01:34 PM
Eeyore Sorry to be obtuse.
I just mean that if CHina get... Mar 17 2004, 01:39 PM
Julian I think Chinese communism is evolving into somethi... Mar 17 2004, 01:42 PM
Vermillion
Tibet unquestionably, although people tend to for... Mar 17 2004, 02:45 PM
Titus
As a big fan of the 1980's, I take that as ... Mar 19 2004, 04:32 AM
christopher
private property is now possible
they can now cho... Mar 19 2004, 05:21 AM
Zixzaxzox China gives us an exciting opportunity to see whet... Mar 19 2004, 11:23 AM
pyotrveliky clearly china is not communist and only partially ... Mar 23 2004, 05:27 AM
PanzerKommand Well, being in the future prediction business and ... Apr 27 2004, 06:54 AM
Titus Actually Vermillion and Panzer, the Chinese' ... Apr 28 2004, 10:57 PM
PanzerKommand
Titus, I agree with your point that it varies wi... Apr 29 2004, 04:39 AM
nikachu
So..is the book fictional or historical fact? An... Apr 29 2004, 10:06 AM
otseng It is good to see how mainland China is moving mor... Apr 29 2004, 02:26 PM
PanzerKommand
Nikachu, both Gavin Menzies's 1421: The Year... May 4 2004, 02:37 AM
PanzerKommand
otseng, that would fit into the WOULD part nicel... May 4 2004, 02:42 AM
Titus
Wrong, as I don't have my copy of the book ... May 4 2004, 03:08 AM
PanzerKommand
Boy, I'm so glad that I bought Levathes... May 4 2004, 03:34 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Simple Version | Time is now: September 2nd, 2010 - 09:06 PM |