logo 
spacer
  

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

If you have an opinion, you should share it! Register Now!

America's Debate hosts the best in news, government, and political debate. Register now to take part in the most civil and constructive debate on the Internet. Join the community, and get ready to be challenged!

Click here to start

America's Debate Radio - 234th Live Edition: Today, 09:00 PM EST.
Stream or Download the newest show | Subscribe to the podcast: iTunes · RSS

> Sponsored Links

Register to remove these ads!

> Welcome to the America's Debate Archive!

Topics that have had no new replies in the last 180 days are moved to the archive.

New replies are not accepted once a topic is moved to the archive, and new topics cannot be started in the archive.

> Corporate Personhood, Good or Bad?
Hero
post Apr 22 2004, 04:46 PM
Post #1


*****
Century Mark

Group: Members
Posts: 218
Member No.: 2,872
Joined: April-7-04

From: Portland, Oregon
Gender: Male
Politics: Independent
Party affiliation: None



For reasons that I don't understand corporations are given exactly the same rights as human beings. The Bill of Rights as well as constitutional rights are given to any corporate body. The only purpose of this that I can see is the evasion of punishment. I don't know a lot about business though, so my question is:

Can anyone put up a reasonable proposition as to why corporate personhood is necessary?

And also:

In what ways does the positive aspects outweigh the negative ones, or vice versa?

I have never heard the conservative/capitolist argument for this... please supply.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Hero   Corporate Personhood   Apr 22 2004, 04:46 PM
Cube Jockey   Can anyone put up a reasonable proposition as to w...   Apr 22 2004, 08:03 PM
Julian   I support corporate personhood for the same reason...   Apr 23 2004, 01:04 PM
CobraNightViper   Julian, you bring up a good point about income tax...   Apr 25 2004, 10:46 PM
Dingo   Can anyone put up a reasonable proposition as to w...   May 9 2004, 09:56 AM
lethe   I'm a bit concerned that while a person who ac...   May 9 2004, 10:35 AM
Julian   I didn't really make it clear on this thread,...   May 9 2004, 12:19 PM
QuantumMekanic   Julian you have a good point here. I say either ta...   Jul 3 2004, 01:41 PM
KyleCoyote   Yes, and that's the problem. Corporate execu...   Aug 24 2004, 06:38 PM
MrJaggers   You have to keep things in context though. The mo...   Aug 27 2004, 08:21 PM
CruisingRam   I think LIMITED corporate personhood is a good thi...   Aug 28 2004, 01:24 AM
MrJaggers   First of all, you need to distinguish the issues, ...   Aug 28 2004, 05:28 PM
Julian   Nice post, Mr Jaggers (and welcome, by the way :t...   Aug 28 2004, 06:45 PM
MrJaggers   I'm not sure how familiar everyone is with cor...   Aug 29 2004, 11:05 PM
CruisingRam   MrJaggers- there is no risk for the CEO today- jus...   Aug 30 2004, 08:45 AM
MrJaggers   Sorry, but this reply doesn't make sense. Th...   Aug 30 2004, 12:58 PM
CruisingRam   In what ways does the positive aspects outweigh th...   Aug 30 2004, 02:06 PM
MrJaggers   First of all, the original founder of the corporat...   Aug 30 2004, 02:58 PM
CruisingRam   In plain language- with all due respect- you are k...   Aug 30 2004, 03:41 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

  
Go to the top of the page - Simple Version Time is now: September 9th, 2010 - 12:12 AM
©2002-2010 America's Debate, Inc.  All rights reserved.