QUOTE(aevans176 @ Dec 5 2005, 12:23 PM)
But... if it weren't for the birth of Christ, and it's Christian roots, the holiday wouldn't exist.
Of course it would. It would not be called Christmas, but civilizations have been celebrating the winter solstice for eons and practically every culture in the world had a late December celebration centuries before Jesus was even a twinkle in God's eye. As has been pointed out, even the Church has not always celebrated Christmas (and some denominations
still don't celebrate it, due to its pagan origins). Were it not for the birth of Jesus, we might be celebrating Sacaea or Saturnalia or Yule or, simply, Solstice Day, but you can be damned sure we'd be following the tradition of every civilization since at least the Egyptians by taking time off at the end of the shortening of the days. That's
why the early Church decided to arbitrarily set the Mass of Christ on December 25 rather than when Jesus might actually have been born. The roots of the holiday are NOT Christian, they're astronomical.
QUOTE(aevans176 @ Dec 5 2005, 12:23 PM)
How many companies don't give off Christmas?
More and more every year.
I'll be working on Christmas - in a store that sells CDs, books, and DVDs. Just about every commercial outlet that I know of in my area will be open on Christmas - gas stations, restaurants, hotels, convenience stores, pharmacies, WalMart, Blockbuster. The only exception I can think of is a couple of grocery stores (and, never fear, they'll do extremely well in the couple of days leading up to the biggest celebration of gluttony in our obese nation's calendar).
QUOTE(aevans176 @ Dec 5 2005, 12:23 PM)
If it was entirely commercial, why would every business in the US that caters to retail business not be open?
Like I said, many of them will be - and more remain open with every passing year. Those that don't will already have had their tills well stuffed by maniacal consumers who are, even now, out in droves, many spending more on non-essentials during the month of December than they do during the rest of the year in its entirety.
QUOTE(aevans176 @ Dec 5 2005, 12:23 PM)
This surely would suggest that most businesses and our government wants to encourage people to spend time with their families on that day...
Really? I'd think it would suggest that most businesses are simply giving their workers a day off, whether they have families or not. Do we observe the birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. to encourage people to spend time with their families? Or Columbus Day or New Year's Day or Veteran's Day or President's Day? Some may
choose to spend time with their families on those days, but there's nothing implicit in the granting of holidays that they are family-oriented.
As for the government encouraging family time, federal holidays are only applicable to federal employees and the District of Columbia. Individual states and individual employers may choose to observe them or not. And, for that matter, Christmas itself wasn't even a federal holiday until 1870 (and it didn't extend to federal employees outside the capital until 1885). Prompted by a consortium of bankers and businessmen to institute "bank holidays", employees were originally denied pay on those days. When Labor Day was initiated in 1894, the
House Committe on Labor declared that "the use of national holidays is to emphasize some great event or principle in the minds of the people by giving them a day of rest and recreation, a day of enjoyment, in commemoration of it". There's nothing in there about "families".
Frankly, I don't care whether retailers acknowledge the
traditional holiday with appropriately pagan evergreens or whether they acknowledge the Catholic feast day that was imposed upon it with appropriately religious decorations like crucifixes and fish. But I
do wish some retailers would develop a bit of taste. To me, Christmas has always been one of the most hideously ugly times of year - unless, of course, everyone's ghastly decorating efforts are buried by a foot of snow.
It's been some time since "the [Christian] reason for the season" was paramount. This year, like every year for the past half-century or so, the bottom line of the holiday season will be... the bottom line. Trust me, coverage of the Christmas season will be much more about profits than peace - though political pundits on both sides are doing their damnedest to see that Christmas is less about either. It seems that our political and religious leaders and their partisan supporters are
far more interested in scoring political points, running down opponents for a variety of reasons, and attacking organizations like the Christian Coalition or the ACLU than they are in, say, the teachings of Christ. The little baby Jesus has become nothing more than a political football. It's as unsurprising as it is sad.
Merry Christmas.