1. Why did Bush make more recess appointments, especially when both sides of the aisle had problems with these appointees?Because he can. I know that sounds trite, but this is fairly common practice for any sitting president. Are these appointments more controversial than most? Maybe. Clinton avoided some fights with some of his appointments as well.
One thing to bear in mind is that these appointments are not permanent. They expire on the next end of term for Congress, which is January 2007. Bolton's UN recess appointment expires then as well. Needless to say if the 2006 elections yield major changes in the balance of power in Congress, Bush may have some serious appointment battles on his hands. We'll see.
2. With the appointment of Julie L. Myers to head the Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau at the Department of Homeland Security has the administration not learned from the Michael Brown head of FEMA problem by making appointments of people with no experience in the departments they are to be in charge of?Cronyism is hardly a new exercise in power allocation. Brown was a more glaring example because an actual disaster happened on his watch. Putting Myers as head of ICE is admittedly quite suspect, as that group has some major battles on its hands in 2006 as it relates to immigration reform and border security. This selection hardly surprises me, however. Crony is as crony does