QUOTE(Mike @ Feb 1 2006, 08:06 PM)
The frequency of the show depends entirely on the popularity of the show. If we consistently max out our listener count, and the phones continue to ring like they did last night, then we will add another day or even days. Also, if we max out our listener count again next week, I will have it bumped up to 50 for the show on the Wed., Feb 15th.
Don't forget to factor in listeners like me who can't catch the live show for whatever reason (maybe a job clash, or just creaky technology - not
just global time differences) that download or stream the MP3 afterwards without signing up for the podcast.
I listened to the show yesterday afternoon (mid-morning your EST) and it was really good.
In fact, I have to say that, having listened to phone-in based talk radio in the USA while on vacation there, it is
really refreshing to hear
and explore what callers think.
I listened to Limbaugh, Hannity
et al a lot while I was last over there on vacation three years ago, and I thought that the general disentchantment with the political process, long touted in the USA, had at least
something to do with the sheer amount of steam and froth being generated by this type of political coverage. It seemed to have infected the whole news agenda, not just on Fox News, but ordinary network bulletins too.
So it was REALLY good to hear sober, good humoured and
temperate political debate going on.
This is the norm on UK political phone-ins - we could even do with a bit of the fire and brimstone approach to liven things up - so I can say that good presenters for this type of thing require
real skill to make it work. You have to probe callers' right right, so that they talk more about their thinking. Not enough probing, and it's just a series of very short soundbites. Too much, and people get defensive and start arguing.
It's a fine line, and on the evidence of show 1, it's one that both
Jaime and
Mike find easy to walk. Well done both of you. (For what it's worth, I thought
Jaime was a natural, and I think
Mike was too when he was able to spend more time on air and not worrying about the technical bugs. Did you both do lots of prep work for the presenting side, or did you just wing it? Either way, well done both!)
QUOTE
QUOTE(christopher @ Feb 1 2006, 01:37 PM)
Within 2 years it will be AD Satellite TV and their own cable channel.
Man, wouldn't that be the best...? It would be the news network "for normal people, by normal people." The slogan could be "Amateur talent, professional production," and we could pick all of the on-air talent and writers (if there was any interest

) from members here at AD!
Maybe so. Certainly, I think that

radio might just catch a mood towards more thoughtful and insightful talk radio that the shouting matches America has got used to. I could quite easily imagine that it will snowball pretty quickly, and wouldn't be remotely surprised if this calendar year it doesn't get syndicated nationally by someone like Clear Channel. (Make sure you retain absolute editorial control if anyone approaches you in such a way.)
Off the back of that, I reckon a TV show could easily follow, with the same sort of format as the radio show.
And then, ultimately, maybe a whole channel. Maybe you could run it along similar lines to this site. Anyone can make a short documentary film on a particular issue, in accordance with

rules - the equivalent of a debate topic opener - and then there could be a national or international phone-in to debate the topics raised. Different time slots could be different forums - mornings could be for domestic policy, casual conversation over lunch, afternoons & early evening for international policy/ war on terror, evenings for news & current events, etc.

on the telly, in other words. Cool, or what?