Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Media Coverage of Katrina
America's Debate > Assorted Issues > The Media
Google
Amlord
A recent string of articles has been written that criticizes the media coverage of Katrina.

An Imperfect Storm: Katrina revealed ineptitude—of the press, that is.

QUOTE
As I’ve written before, virtually all of the gripping stories from Katrina were untrue. All of those stories about, in Paula Zahn’s words, “bands of rapists, going block to block”? Not true. The tales of snipers firing on medevac helicopters? Bogus. The yarns, peddled on Oprah by New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin and the New Orleans police chief, that “little babies” were getting raped in the Superdome and that the bodies of the murdered were piling up? Completely false. The stories about poor blacks dying in comparatively huge numbers because American society “left them behind”? Nah-ah. While most outlets limited themselves to taking Nagin’s estimate of 10,000 dead at face value, Editor and Publisher—the watchdog of the media—ran the headline, “Mortuary Director Tells Local Paper 40,000 Could Be Lost in Hurricane.”

<snip>

This barely captures how badly the press bungled Katrina coverage. Keep in mind that the most horrifying tales of woe that captivated the press and prompted news anchors to scream—quite literally—at federal officials occurred within the safe zone around the Superdome where the press was operating. Shame on local officials for fomenting fear and passing along newly minted urban legends, but double shame on the press for recycling this stuff uncritically. Members of the press had access to the Superdome. Why not just run in and look for the bodies? Interview the rape victims? Couldn’t be bothered? The major networks had hundreds of people in New Orleans. Was there not a single intern available to fact-check? The coverage actually cost lives. Helicopters were grounded for 24 hours in response to media reports of sniper attacks. At least two patients died waiting to be evacuated.

And yet, an ubiquitous media chorus claims simultaneously that Katrina was Bush’s worst hour and the press’s best. That faultless paragon of media scrupulousness Dan Rather proclaimed it one of the “quintessential great moments in television news.” Christiane Amanpour explained, “I think what’s interesting is that it took a Katrina, you know, to bring us back to where we belong. In other words, real journalists, real journalism, and I think that’s a good thing.”


Katrina: What the Media Missed
QUOTE
Remember the dozens, maybe hundreds, of rapes, murders, stabbings and deaths resulting from official neglect at the Superdome after Hurricane Katrina? The ones that never happened, as even the national media later admitted?

Sure, we all remember the original reporting, if not the back-pedaling.

Here's another one: Do you remember the dramatic TV footage of National Guard helicopters landing at the Superdome as soon as Katrina passed, dropping off tens of thousands saved from certain death? The corpsmen running with stretchers, in an echo of M*A*S*H, carrying the survivors to ambulances and the medical center? About how the operation, which also included the Coast Guard, regular military units, and local first responders, continued for more than a week?

Me neither. Except that it did happen, and got at best an occasional, parenthetical mention in the national media. The National Guard had its headquarters for Katrina, not just a few peacekeeping troops, in what the media portrayed as the pit of Hell. Hell was one of the safest places to be in New Orleans, smelly as it was. The situation was always under control, not surprisingly because the people in control were always there.


Question for debate:

Did the national media misreport the Katrina story?
Google
Ted
Did the national media misreport the Katrina story?


You bet they did. The pictures of the 500 busses under water that could have been used to get folks out of the city if the idiot who is the mayor was awake, did not get anywhere near the play that the “rape and starvation” at the superdome got. The real facts that would lay most of the blame for the trapped people on city and state bungling got little if any coverage.

http://wizbangblog.com/2006/03/29/what-eve...s-bus-fleet.php

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/...1215.shtml?s=ic


Yesterday the Army Corp of Engineers said the levy failures were their errors and the mistakes in design and construction go back into the 50s. FEMA was far from perfect but the CITY should bear much of the blame for moving people right into the path of the storm instead of evacuating them.

Meanwhile the moron who was the mayor and bungled what could have been a orderly and successful evacuation just got re elected!
niftydrifty
Those aren't necessarily articles. Those are essentially op/eds. And furthermore, don't the media essentially misrepresent EVERY story? I'd be hard-pressed to come up with any topic where fundamental facts weren't fudged, left out, and/or exaggerated. The media's true bias isn't left or right. It's sensationalistic. "What can we say about this event to make it sound truly awful/interesting/astounding?" That's what the media do. To everything.

Amlord, I would have written your opening sentence differently. I would have said, "In recent years, right-leaning pundits have focused their primary criticisms not on anyone in power, or of consequence, but on the US mainstream media. Their focus has not been on actions or deeds, but on words, and on the shaping of public opinion -- yet only when it shifts in a way they do not like. Here are a few more examples"

Did the national media misreport the Katrina story?

I agree, they absolutely did. But this question is much too vague for my taste. The national media are thousands of entities. Many of them represented/misrepresented the story very differently than many of the others. Maybe some even got it mostly exactly right. If we talk about how the media misreported, are we talking about an estimated average misreporting on the part of those thousands of media entities? Are we merely talking about how most of those thousands' misreporting SEEMED that way to each of us? The way thousands of unrelated entities' actions mostly seems to me, is something that I hope everyone would be reluctant to guess about.

And none of us are ever going to agree on to what degree blame lies with Bush for Katrina. It's just entirely up to our own opinions. Did the Federal Government even have that much obligation at all? It's totally up to you.

I recently spent 3 weeks sick, at home every day, watching cable news, day after day after day. This experience convinced me that watching the cable news channels can make you less, not more informed, about the world we live in. Opinions thoroughly pervade all coverage. Everything is sensationalized. All coverage is event-driven, not issue-driven. It's a very sad state of affairs.
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.