For this category, the following information is required for a nomination to be valid:

*The name of the member that you would most like to see appointed to the United States Supreme Court.

NOTE: The nominated member must not be banned, restricted or validating.

Reference: Members list

Julian

This office requires a mixture of intelligence, extensive learning, and no small measure of wit.

(Let's ignore the small matter of American citizenship.)

Wertz. Smart, well-read, well-spoken, researches, reads, learns, argues coherently and understands complex subjects.

He's well-read, up on the law and its (mis)application, intelligent, articulate, humane, and righteous: nighttimer.

Mike

I figure I'll go with someone who knows the law...Jaime.

CP

CubeJockey

Mrs Pigpen

Mrs Pigpen as well

For two reasons I've got to nominate my homegirl Artemise to the U.S. Supreme Court.

First, we've gotta get some more babes on the High Court. Second, she's more liberal than I'll ever be which means she'd tick off Tony Scalia something fierce.

Since I'm a conservative, this may seem surprising, but I would nominate Wertz for the USSC. He would research case law and precedent probably better than the current crop of robed ones, and he definetely would have as his goal, the good of the American people, all Americans.

Amlord