QUOTE(nebraska29 @ Jun 17 2006, 05:32 PM)

Questions for debate.
1.)If Lamont wins, will we see a turning of the tide in regards to anti-war candidates becoming more prominent or willing to run?
2.)Is there room for the Joe Liebermans of the party in the democratic party?
3.)Who will hurt the democrats more in '08-the Joe Liberman types, or the Ned Lamonts?
4.)To what extent has the blogosphere influenced this campaign and what does it portend for future campaigns?
1. I don't think Lamont is going to win. I'm confident that Joe Lieberman is still fairly popular with Connecticut voters and they aren't going to follow the lead of a loud group of far-Left activists.
2. There had better be. I don't like Lieberman's coziness with the President, but on most issues, Lieberman is a pretty middle-of-the-road Democrat. While he may be bland, dull and colorless, he appeals to middle-of-the-road Democrats and certainly to Independents who don't want every Democratic Senator to have a 100 percent adversarial relationship with a Republican President. In Ohio we have a Democrat in Ted Strickland who has the support of the NRA. In Pennsylvania, the challenger to Rick Santorum, Bob Casey is pro-life. With the exception of the Zell Millers of the world, there has to be room in the Democratic Party for moderates and even conservatives.
3. I don't know enough about Lamont to say he'd be bad for the party. I understand he's wealthy and he's never held any political office, but he's justified in challenging Lieberman if he feels he's become out of touch with the folks back home. Lieberman is still leading in the polls, but Lamont is gaining momentum and prompting speculation that Lieberman may drop out of the August primary and run as a independent in November.
4. Well, certainly the MoveOn.org and DailyKos folks dislike Lieberman and have bolstered Lamont. Still, the majority of voters don't pay any attention to bloggers who tend to be the activists who can start fights, but not necessarily win them. Until the bloggers are successful in knocking off politicians they don't like, their power is still more theory than reality.