Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Executive In Chief As Legislator
America's Debate > Archive > Everything Else Archive > [A] Old news
Google
Jaime
It's official. We finally have proof that a majority in the House, Senate and President's Administration do not understand basic social studies. How else can the passing of the Trade Promotion Authority Bill be explained?

Our legislators apparantly aren't bothered by the fact that they have just given up some of their authority to a different branch of government. Do these branches not know that they are to be separate?

It is NOT ok for the President, the Chief Executive, to legislate. If President Bush wanted to create and pass laws he should have run for congress. He has no constitutional authority to make "fast-track" trade legislation with foreign nations.
Google
Mike
Here is what appears to be a fairly extensive and well researched article on the subject:

http://www.brook.edu/comm/policybriefs/pb91.htm

From what I understand, this doesn't give the President full authority. It merely allows him Congress-free negotiation. When the President strikes a deal, it still must be approved by Congress. Congress, however, cannot ammend the President's recommendations. It's either yes or no.

This in itself is something I can somewhat agree with, mainly because it will be less likely that we get bills chock-full-o-pork. And if they are full of pork, we know to whom we should address our complaints.

And of course I have to take this opportunity to rib those Congressmen on the left.

From foxnews.com:

QUOTE
The bill also gives tax credits for laid-off workers to pay for 65 percent of health insurance costs. Suppliers to import-hit companies would become eligible for the Trade Adjustment Assistance program as would farmers and ranchers hurt by imports. Some workers whose factories are moved overseas could receive benefits, and a program to compensate older workers forced to take lower-paying jobs would be created.

The additions would nearly double those eligible to about 200,000 and triple spending on the program to about $12 billion over 10 years.


Way to redistribute that wealth! That's about $42 from every single American over ten years. That's $60,000 dollars for each of the 200,000 people you "help". I'm glad my donation to the Nation's coffers can go to good use. Your guys seems to think I don't need the money. Then again, you also thought $300 wouldn't help me either.

Mike
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.