Presumably, the impact of the global protests of last weekend.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2765875.stmAccording to this article, Blair is slowing down his march to war, but the writer says that is due to the split within the UN rather than the protests.
To my mind, however, it seems that such a huge display of popular dissent must have had an impact on the Blair administration, and whilst I am under no illusions that the protests will avert war, I do think they have made it more difficult for Blair to proceed with his plans for war, particularly without UN backing.
Bush, however, is apparently 'shrugging off' the protests. i don't think they have made much difference to his policies, position or long term ends.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...iraq_protests_5Ari Fleischer, by the way, is an idiot. Firstly, hoew can he still be spouting such McCarthy -esque anti-Communist rubbish in 2003, and secondly, how can he seriously believe that US missiles caused the collpase of the Soviet Union?