Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: More than just hungry caterpillars?
America's Debate > Political Debate > General Political Debate
Google
Julian
Presdient Bush praises Egyptian Nobel laureate Naguib Mahfouz

QUOTE
<snip>US President George Bush has also expressed condolences, calling Mahfouz "an extraordinary artist who conveyed the richness of Egyptian history and society to the world".

A White House spokesman said the author's work would "introduce his beloved Egypt to Americans and to readers around the world for generations to come". <snip>


Mahfouz, a Muslim himself, in one of his novels, made some comments on God that were viewed dimly by some fundamentalist Muslim groups. So much so that one extremist in particular attempted his murder 12 years ago. He survived - obviously enough - but was in poor health for the rest of his (long) life. To some eyes, he exemplifies the kind of moderate Islam that has been cast into shadow by more, er, robust interpretations of that faith.

President Bush is not a man widely known to be an avid reader of novels, much less novels by Egyptians that have received the Nobel prize for literature.

So:
What is behind the Whitehouse's comments on this story?

A slow news day - does the President routinely issue statements of sorrow following the death of relatively obscure (i.e. not high on the best-seller lists, at least not for some years) Middle Eastern authors?

A genuine and praiseworthy attempt to reach out to moderate Islam?

A clumsy announcement that illustrates just how out of touch the Bush administration is?

Or something else?
Google
Victoria Silverwolf
I have to admit that I have never read anything by Mahfouz. I think it would be very difficult to find any politician in the USA who has read any of his works. With that in mind, I cast no particular blame on the President for making such a statement about someone with whom he was probably not at all familiar. I suspect that the President's advisors told him that a major literary figure had died, and that he was a symbol of liberal Islam. It's a non-controversial gesture for him to offer praise.

Although this is not that big a deal in the world of international relations, it can do nothing but good. Liberalization of Islam should always be supported whenever possible.

"Genuine?" In the sense that the President really knew all about Mahfouz? Probably not. "Praiseworthy?" Sure, as any such gesture would be. "Out of touch?" Only in the sense that almost all Americans -- myself included -- are out of touch with international literature.

For this statement, I'm willing to give the President a thumbs up.
Mrs. Pigpen
Healing Iraq has a lot to say about the man.

QUOTE
Mahfouz was a distinguished, prolific writer, a humanist, a free thinker, and a unique example of the rare breed of Arab intellectuals managing to break free of the constraints of Arab society to preach a universal message of tolerance.

*snip*

In addition to the hostility he faced from the religious establishment, he was also criticized by so-called intellectuals in the Arab world for his moderate stance toward Israel and his outspoken support for President Anwar Al-Sadat and the Camp David peace accords. Before that, he was branded a reactionary because of his well-hidden disapproval of the destructive policies of President Gamal Abdul Nasser and the coup that brought him to power in 1952. Many of his novels were banned in Arab countries.

Mahfouz is most celebrated for his epic work, The Cairo Trilogy, a novel in three volumes (Bain Al-Qasrain, Qasr Al-Shawq, Al-Sukkariya) published in 1955, which follows the fortunes of a middle-class Egyptian family through three generations during British colonial rule, independence under the monarchy and the coup that brought Arab nationalists to power. The last installment was significant because it depicted the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in Egypt around WWII and the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) movement, which later produced people like Sayyid Qutb and Ayman Al-Zawahiri. The trilogy shares many similarities with The Brothers Karamazov (not surprising since Fiodor Dostoevsky was a huge influence on the Egyptian novelist), both in its underlying philosophical questions, and its portrayal of the author’s own struggle with spiritual and social issues.

*snip*

During the furor in the Islamic world following the publishing of Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses, and the subsequent fatwa for apostasy, blind Egyptian cleric Omar Abdul Rahman stated that if Mahfouz was punished for his novel, Rushdie would not have dared write his. It didn’t help that Mahfouz publicly defended Rushdie’s right to publish his novel.

*snip*
Mahfouz was buried at Al-Hussein mosque near his birthplace in Cairo, according to his will. His funeral was attended by a few friends and relatives and a score of Egyptian officials, but the people of Cairo who made the characters of Mahfouz's novels were absent.

It is regrettable that funerals of great men, such as Mahfouz, in our Arab world are not attended by the Arab masses that were the main body of their work. Our people prefer to march in thousands at the funerals of their oppressors and dictators.


Egypt is a key ally, and one of its best authors (arguably one of the best authors from the Middle East) just died. He was a ground-breaker, and very moderate as well. This was our highest official, sending condolences to its friend. I think the sentiments were proper and correct. In that capacity Bush is acting as a dignitary not an individual. He is speaking for Americans, many of whom do value the author's work even if he personally has (most likely) never read a word of it himself.
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.