QUOTE(Fife and Drum @ Feb 7 2007, 11:54 AM)

Understand that not everyone lives in Mayberry RFD.
I know that, but neighborhoods are safe because the people who live in them are good people. That's why bad neighborhoods have so much crime, because poor people rob and assault each other. People that live in South Central L.A. do not take a bus and invade the homes in Beverly Hills, they rob the guy down the street. If all the police were removed from my area the likelihood of me being robbed would not change, because
the people make my neighborhood safe, not the police. Same for a bad neighborhood, increase the police force and nothing would change, because police do not stop crimes, they arrest people for committing them. The reasons crimes are committed have nothing to do with the police, it is from necessity. A salesman making $100,000 annually has never mugged somebody, those crimes are committed by people below the poverty line. Move those people above the poverty line and they won't commit those crimes. You don't help out crime by giving cops more resources to arrest people. The money that goes to police weaponry could go toward education, job training, or investments in the neighborhood. The police force is armed with handguns, shotguns, machine guns, handcuffs, mace, tazers, batons, retractable metal clubs, squad cars, radios, helicopters, etc. They have all the resources at their disposal and this leads to a violent society. You want to stop crime? Invest in education. Create jobs. But that never happens, every year the police budget grows. The police are supposed to be a self-deprecating entity, meaning the better they do their job, the less need there is for them. Instead, they are a self-serving entity. Cops keep finding new reasons to take our taxpayers dollars. And because of people like you
Fife and Drum, and
aevans176, and
nebraska29, they will continue to get our money. The politicians ask the police what they need. Nobody ever asks the criminals why they do what they do. Wouldn't that get to the source of the problem? Why ask a cop how to stop crime? Ask a criminal.
QUOTE(Fife and Drum @ Feb 7 2007, 11:54 AM)

In 2005, law enforcement agencies reported an estimated 2,154,126 burglary offenses.
Source. So according to your statement, at least 1,077,064 of these were committed by police officers? Must have missed those news stories.
If you want to slam the police that’s certainly your right, but please be prepared to back up your wild claims with some proof.
Almost every time, not every time, but almost every time a police officer pulls over a citizen, they are committing a robbery. Perfect example, by my house there is a one lane road with one or two intersections, but they are not four way intersections, they are only three-way intersection, one leads to a park, one to a subdivision, the other into industrial parks, and this is where the police wait. Both the park and the industrial park close after business hours, so after 5 PM, neither one of these intersections have traffic. So people routinely roll these stop signs because there is no reason to stop. There is no difference between a man in a ski mask waiting in the shadows and a police officer patrolling a rarely used intersection waiting for a nonchalant motorist. The police are ROBBING people. The other night I drove to work at night, on my way I saw a speed trap set up, and 4 other people pulled over within 7 miles of a highway. I guess that night people were particularly bad drivers, or maybe cops had an initiative to pull people over. Cops have to make budget too.
QUOTE(Fife and Drum @ Feb 7 2007, 11:54 AM)

Top 10 most stressful jobs.Police officer ranks as number two.
And just why do you think it’s the second most stressful job? I’ll tell you why.
Every time they pull someone over they take the risk of being hit by another car.
Every time they stick their head towards the window and ask for a drivers license and registration they risk being shot.
Every time they respond to a burglary they risk their life.
Every time they respond to a domestic violence issue they risk their life.
I could go on but hopefully you get the point that in almost
every situation in which they respond their life could be in danger.
And for one moment consider the alternative without a police force. They are there for a purpose and it’s not to be slandered to the low life level in which you place them.
I would like to see the police operate like the Fire Department, on call, not proactive. They are never proactive when it comes to stopping the crimes that matter, assault, robbery, homicide, rape, and the like. The cops are NEVER there when you need them, they are there AFTER you need them. A woman just raped doesn't need a cop, she needed a cop, past tense. The only thing they do pro-actively is take our taxpayers money and harass minorities and teenagers. Like I keep saying, they do more harm than good. We need less cops, reform in how they operate, and more teachers. Our society will be better off for it.
To
nebraska29,
This case isn't about the fetus, it's about the contempt for which police officers view the general public. To them, we are scum. The police did not care about this woman or her child, because she is scum. Miscarriages can be caused by
stress.
Study #2Being arrested can be stressful. Being broke can be stressful too, as this woman obviously was. She did not have enough money to pay for plates for her car so she created fake tags. The bottom line is that the police caused a baby to die.