QUOTE(Victoria Silverwolf @ Feb 6 2007, 03:39 AM)

Should worker's compensation provisions provide for mental ailments?
Yes.
The Nebraska court seems to have ruled correctly in this case, but only because the law concerning worker's compensation clearly limits its coverage to physical injury. This is a bad law. It cannot be denied that certain occupations that are extremely stressful and dangerous can cause enormous emotional damage. It may be more difficult to determine when a job causes emotional damage than physical damage, but the damage done is no less real.
If it can be proved that beyond a reasonable doubt that one's work caused emotional damage, compensation should be made. It is even more important for stressful and hazardous jobs to try to prevent such damage, as they try to prevent physical injury. Such efforts would include things like counseling for employees.
I'm entirely in agreement with you on this. By limiting compensation to physical ailments, the state is continuing to treat mental illness as a stigma, rather than a legitimate problem. Are we to seriously believe that only the body breaks down and never the mind? We don't know anyone who has had anxiety, depression, or who suffers from schizophrenia or bi-polar disorder? If there ever was a 'there out to be a law" moment, this is one.