QUOTE(BaphometsAdvocate @ Jan 25 2007, 07:05 AM)

yes, yes, yes... but still sometimes it would be much more economical to post that you think so-and-so is bleepzingfludderfittangzippitttyzoing moron who can sassafrassfrickfrackflimflarm until they zabbadabbahickorystick to the zorpostonckaling.
QUOTE(AuthorMusician @ Jan 25 2007, 10:35 AM)

Heh, the Jabberwocky answer to civil debate, huh?
Well zippoff twarny vale, and stick it where the lumborly lies.
I'm all for it. No banned curse-o-meter words allowed. If it doesn't meet the nonsense rules, PAP goes the worsel, and it's dire dregafala with you!
I think this would be fun, somewhat challenging and a way to vent steam in a relatively harmless way.
The Jabber-thonkyew Casual Thread for the jumping Adadaddas among us. I'm twippy with it.
It'll drive the spell-a-rama nickles.
QUOTE
Seamus:Aye, ye snorgly hordes of manglefloppers! Fear not thine ferfely
portmanteaux! Hurl thy
neologistic gibberish! Let the
noncing commence!
Rules:1. All the rules for the casual conversation threads still apply. No personal attacks. No attempts to get around the profanity filter.
2. If you wish to jabberwock anyone in effagy, invent a completely new name for a fictional character that bears no resemblance whatsoever to the real name. If anyone can figure out who you're targeting, you're being too specific. For example, "President Bush" could be "Gormulus Maximus", but "Shrub" would be too easily identifiable.
3. Be as creative as possible. Wit counts more than clarity.
Question for debate:
Art thy wits anon bersmankled by the exploitments of Gom Sninkerfeister?(Any awards for this topic should be credited to
BaphometsAdvocate and
Author-Musician)
Edited to add: Ooops. A similar topic has already been closed, so I was looking for a way to retract the topic. However,
entspeak wondered if it was different enough to pass muster, so we'll await an official ruling. If the topic remains active, perhaps the nonce game is on.