QUOTE(Daffygrl)
That is quite possibly one of the most unnecessarily hateful things I've seen posted yet. What do you mean "step out from the shadow of her father"? She continued to pursue her father's dream - how is that a bad thing? She campaigned to bring awareness of heart disease and stroke to people - how is that a bad thing? She made a positive contribution to society - how is that a bad thing? I'd say she was more of a somebody than some other folks I could mention.
And who are you to say who or what is newsworthy? Feel free not to participate in the thread if you don't believe the topic is worth responding to. I do it all the time.
Tell me the likelihood of reading of her exploits in first person detail on major news outlets if her name was something other than King? Local paper sure. Local community outlet, maybe. Reuters? Yeah right.
There is very little emotion attached to the observation DG, either for or against. I'm not fond of sensationalism as it amplifies and distorts the original subject by retelling itself and evolving. And yes it is happening in this thread whether you want to admit it or not. In Falwell's case the media worked against him with only the individual personal experience seperating itself out as the lone wolf response from Carlito. His post defined Falwell as something other than a bad guy. Do I like him? Not particularly but his post is a classic case of the individual being overshadowed by the reputation. This is what I meant by stepping out of the shadow.
The point is celebrity obits have a habit of exaggerating a person to the point where sometimes the end result is unrecognizable from the original. Facts blur and suddenly Yolanda's accomplishments are no longer independant from her father's. Time does that. Suddenly Yolanda the person becomes dehumanized into MLK's daughter. Individuality tends to get lost in celebrity cases. I'm skeptical of emotional displays of grieving here as they can morph into soap opera melodramas in the blink of an eye. As in something less than genuine. Anna Nicole ring a bell?
The media loves to pull emotional triggers, and easily identifiable people are efficient vehicles for that - err hook, line, and sinker.
In Yolanda's case she's viewed as a care-giver and an activist but time always blurs the facts from the parent onto the child in these celeb cases.
Always. Only her personal friends will remember the defining traits of her character. This is the curse of celebrity deaths and why I find them so very distastful when thrust into the public spotlight because they trigger unnecessary emotion, sometimes for and other times against. At best they can live out their lives as ordinary people, in
Daniel Smith's case they can end more tragically, with the common thread of being carved into bite-sized
infotainment for the masses. They are none of our business yet others allow their name to be used for commercial purposes. Has Yolanda been commercialized? Not yet. But I'm certain of the outcome, so much so I feel it is safe to talk about it in the past tense.
When Yolanda's story makes it to the tabloids, and trust me it
will get there, her accomplishments, her insights, and her dignity will be thrust into the same space that shares itself with UFO sightings. Now how respectful does that sound? Celebrity reputations do not die at one's death, they grow, with good and evil becoming more of a semantic than anything else. Sound cynical? How does realistic grab you?
Offer her the dignity of privacy and the safe passage into oblivion.
When I see, "To parody the Geico commercial, "does having a parent who is a doctor make the child less a doctor"? I don't think so." I doubt very much her deeds will outlive the name, especially coming from such a cultural icon. Wishful thinking at best BOF. And since we are on the subject of parodies have you considered the numerous marketers who are going to pressure the family to get the rights to the King name?
In fact if a charity is made in her name, which has a 50/50 chance of happening, her name will be fully commercialized as a trademark for social endeavors which may sound nice at first but could easily devolve into something trite. Think KFC chicken. The Colonel. ICON!! Will it be the well managed like the
Betty Ford clinic or are they simply
selling the name?