Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Everything's All Right in the Middle East
America's Debate > Archive > Assorted Issues Archive > [A] International Debate
Google
Robert Levin
EVERYTHING'S ALL RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE EAST
by Robert Levin

Can we, just for a minute, dispense with the hand-wringing and acknowledge that the problem Israel and the Palestinians are having with one another is actually their mutual solution to the problem of being mortal?

Of course, to understand what I'm talking about it is first necessary to recognize that it's not love or sex or money that makes the world go around but the fact of death; that what drives virtually everything we believe and do is the need to reduce, to at least a manageable degree of fear, the terror and panic the anticipation of extinction causes us. (If you can't quite grasp this notion, if you have to be reminded that terror and panic constitute the human default condition, then whatever you're believing and doing is working for you.)

Of the myriad subtle and blatant ways we've come up with to make living with an impossible given tolerable, one example would be the symbolic immortality we assure ourselves of by the making of a scientific discovery, or a work of art, that will continue to exercise an influence on the world after our departure. Another is the accumulation of inordinate wealth. The god-like trappings great sums of money buy enable us to feel not just superior to the common man, but less vulnerable to the common fate. Still another is getting "high," which is about getting ABOVE the body that we know will one day be our undoing.

And then there's our invention of an afterlife. Presenting us with a chance to survive death--if we honor the pronouncements and follow the dictates we've assigned to deities of our own fashioning--it's this immortality illusion that's at the heart of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

The Arabs are qualifying for eternity by doing what they've determined to be God's work, which is to make war on those who, ignoring or questioning His authority, are undermining His plan for the planet. And Israel, dropped in the Arab's midst, its diverse culture implicitly challenging the validity of Arab beliefs, provides the Arabs with the infidel they need to carry out their mission. For Arabs, it's not about killing Jews, per se. Jews are simply a fortuitously placed means to a purchase on heaven. (You could say that their culture being, by all appearances, limited in its repertoire of immortality illusions to the resources of Islam, suicide is the only instrument of self-perpetuation available to the Palestinian terrorists.)

On the other hand, the Arabs afford Israelis an opportunity to continually certify their biblically bestowed "chosen" status--AND TO ASSURE THEMSELVES OF THE POST-CORPOREAL REWARDS IMPLICIT IN THE ANOINTMENT--by constantly threatening, but never accomplishing, Israel's destruction. Persistently testing Israel's exalted designation but never disproving it, enabling Israel to be embattled AND remain intact, the Arabs are every bit the blessing to Israel that Israel is to the Arabs.

It follows that the violence each side visits on the other must be measured; balances and proportions need to be kept. For one side to win, after all, would be for both sides to lose; would, that is, return BOTH sides to a contemplation of the Void. We might call this aiding and abetting of one another's immortality illusions--the cooperation and the accommodations it requires--the deeper definition of the "social contract."

So we can engage ad infinitum in the most earnest discussions about anti-Semitism, about Arafat, about Sharon, about territory and occupation, and forever miss the real dynamic of the situation. The Arab-Israeli problem is, again, a solution to a more pressing problem, to what is, literally as well as figuratively, the mother of all problems. And what accounts for the tenaciousness of the conflict is the ongoing success it's enjoying in the service of its underlying agenda. As long as this holds true, Arabs and Israelis will, on one level or another, be enemies. Because for all of the horrors hostilities between them cause, they cause a more acceptable, a more BEARABLE species of horror than the fact of oblivion does.

The pain we are witnessing is a palliative. These are not the worst of times in the Middle East.






[FONT=Geneva][FONT=Times][FONT=Arial][FONT=Geneva][SIZE=7][FONT=Geneva][SIZE=14]
[SIZE=7][FONT=Geneva][FONT=Arial][SIZE=14][FONT=Arial][SIZE=14][COLOR=blue][SIZE
=14][SIZE=14]
Google
Jaime
Hi Robert, welcome to the forum.

I must admit, I've read your post at least 10 times. With as much as I like adversity, I must also admit I was really hoping to pick it apart. That is not going to be the case, however.

On the whole, I agree with your assessment of the Middle East. I also agree with your assertion regarding death-obsession in most cultures.

I get the idea that most of our members tend to agree also or they'd have been all over you by now.

Your post reminds me of something I wrote back in high school. At the time I thought I was being funny. I was writing about things that would never happen and one of those things I listed was "peace between Palestine and Israel." Maybe I was a little smarter at 16 than I credit myself...
JohnProia
Immortality, not land, as the Middle East problem? I'll have to toss and turn this idea through my head for the next few days in order to comprehend this new facet of the conflict.
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.