QUOTE(Bikerdad @ Jul 3 2007, 01:27 PM)

QUOTE
BD, I'll bite, how do either the Seattle or Louisville enrollment programs deny equality of opportunity to anyone? Would they have ensured equality of outcome? And the Constitution equal protection clause and all, does seem to support equal outcomes in political rights doesn't it?
They deny the opportunity to go to the school you choose by virtue of where you choose to live. And no, the Constitution's equal protection clause does not support "equal outcomes" in political rights. If I believed that it did, then I'd advocate for proportional representation based on race, or based on sex, or based on religion, or etc etc.. What it guarantees is that when the Gubmint interracts with you, it interracts with you as Citizen. Not as Black, White, Purple, etc. Citizen. That's it. If you want to call that an "outcome", have at it. Most folks would consider the results of the interraction as the "outcome."
So the opportunity being denied in very few cases and at that usually for the short term if the child and parents are still adamant about going to the school based on location, that opportunity is not for an equal education and equal chance to climb as high as one wants in life (you know, the American dream and all), the opportunity being denied is to go to school as close as possible to one's door. That is the equality of opportunity?
If we are going to expand out the equality of opportunity in this world, do you really believe it exists. Why does a district have to use the closest school model? What if I want to go to one six miles away instead of four? Do all districts have to be drawn so that the closest school is the school every child goes to? Do you think this decision guarantees that?