QUOTE(vsrenard @ Aug 31 2007, 07:40 PM)

"Virginia Republicans announced legislation Wednesday that would prohibit public colleges and universities from accepting illegal immigrants even if they attended a public high school and were brought to the United States at an early age by their parents."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...7082901619.htmlI can understand the outrage some people feel that illegal aliens are taking spots at colleges that are too full to accept legal citizens, if such a thing can even be measured. But I wonder if, since the illegals are likely here to stay, if we aren't cutting of our nose to spite our own face--if they are here to stay, we might as well make sure they are educated and have the best chance to succeed.
Topic questions:
Is it good policy for America to bar illegals from attending public college here, in terms of cost, benefit to country, and fairness?
Is it fair to penalize illegal minors for the actions of their parents (assuming they were brought into the country by their parents at a young age)? Huh? Here's where my non-USA brain starts to fuse. Illegal immigrants, surely, cannot legally do anything very much - they can't legally work (because they don't have a work permit) they can't claim welfare (because they don't exist in the welfare rolls) and they can't go to schools or colleges because they aren't entitled to. Even paying an out-of-state tuition fee doesn't cut it, because you have to apply for a valid student visa on your home country's passport to be able to register in the first place.
Is the US immigration service that overstretched and/or badly run that it cannot deal with this?
Now, if someone enters illegally then claims asylum, and the authorities grant them leave to remain, then by definition they stop being illegal migrants and become legal, in which case their rights change.
So I don't really see how it can be anything but good policy to exclude illegals form the public (and the private) education system. If the system defines them as illegal, they don't get to do ANYTHING. If you want them to be entitled to do anything, maybe it's their status of illegality that needs to be reviewed, and not education policy.
The same logic applies to illegal immigrants who entered the country as infants or children. Certainly it isn't fair to punish them for the sins of their parents, but deportation isn't punishment if you are deported with your family and you didn't enter legally in the first place (if you did, and you haven't done anything illegal since, then it isn't deportation, it's banishment).
That all makes me seem anti-immigration, and I'm not, at least not in principle. Ulitmately, it seems to me that there is a logical conflict in the idea of arguing that those that are illegally present should be given any accommodation while
still being classified as illegally present. It's as daft as passing a law that says incarcerated felons cannot legally drive a car.
Of course they can't drive a car - they're in prison!
If you're going to educate them, let them work, ask them to pay taxes, and all the normal things of a society, you cannot still think of them as being illegally there. Is this some attempt at an immigrant amnesty or something? That might not be, of itself, a bad idea, but let's at least recognise that there is an elephant in the room.