This came out after most of the debate on this thread, and I found it illuminating. It kind of reminds me about the Katrina mythology - once a story makes it into the national consciousness, it becomes "true" and no one cares to know otherwise.
Media myths about the Jena 6You really should read the whole article, which is written by a local journalist who knows the kids, knows the school and knows the facts. Here are a few of the myths debunked.
QUOTE
Myth 1: The Whites-Only Tree. There has never been a "whites-only" tree at Jena High School. Students of all races sat underneath this tree. When a student asked during an assembly at the start of school last year if anyone could sit under the tree, it evoked laughter from everyone present – blacks and whites. As reported by students in the assembly, the question was asked to make a joke and to drag out the assembly and avoid class.
Myth 2: Nooses a Signal to Black Students. An investigation by school officials, police, and an FBI agent revealed the true motivation behind the placing of two nooses in the tree the day after the assembly. According to the expulsion committee, the crudely constructed nooses were not aimed at black students. Instead, they were understood to be a prank by three white students aimed at their fellow white friends, members of the school rodeo team. (The students apparently got the idea from watching episodes of "Lonesome Dove.") The committee further concluded that the three young teens had no knowledge that nooses symbolize the terrible legacy of the lynchings of countless blacks in American history. When informed of this history by school officials, they became visibly remorseful because they had many black friends. Another myth concerns their punishment, which was not a three-day suspension, but rather nine days at an alternative facility followed by two weeks of in-school suspension, Saturday detentions, attendance at Discipline Court, and evaluation by licensed mental-health professionals. The students who hung the nooses have not publicly come forward to give their version of events.
...
Myth 7: The Schoolyard Fight. The event on Dec. 4, 2006 was consistently labeled a "schoolyard fight." But witnesses described something much more horrific. Several black students, including those now known as the Jena 6, barricaded an exit to the school's gym as they lay in wait for Justin Barker to exit. (It remains unclear why Mr. Barker was specifically targeted.)
When Barker tried to leave through another exit, court testimony indicates, he was hit from behind by Mychal Bell. Multiple witnesses confirmed that Barker was immediately knocked unconscious and lay on the floor defenseless as several other black students joined together to kick and stomp him, with most of the blows striking his head. Police speculate that the motivation for the attack was related to the racially charged fights that had occurred during the previous weekend.
...
Myth 11: Jena Is One of the Most Racist Towns in America. Actually, Jena is a wonderful place to live for both whites and blacks. The media's distortion and outright lies concerning the case have given this rural Louisiana town a label it doesn't deserve.
This case was like the Katrina coverage, with journalists' bias coloring their portrayal, and thus our understanding of these events. Violent criminals become "model youth" bacause they are black. Local (democratic) politicians' incompetence and a heroic Coast Guard rescue operation becomes "George Bush hates black people." I just don't know what we can do. The perpetrators are
invited to awards shows for assaulting a classmate. As a commenter at The Source noted,
Is this what we hopped on buses and marched for? Well, no.
If the Christian Science Monitor article isn't enough detail for you (and maybe you don't trust wikipedia...), you can also
click here and choose "chronological order of events."