QUOTE(scubatim @ Dec 7 2007, 02:18 PM)

QUOTE(CruisingRam @ Dec 7 2007, 01:01 PM)

Aevens kind of hit on it- here is the deal- Gen-y-ers have figured out that they owe an employer nothing more than what is expected during work hours- the idea that an employer should be able to run you down after work to require more work is not good work ethic- it is exploitation by the company. You are hired to work 9-5, you shouldn't be expected to work outside those hours, or deal with work outside those hours.
your work determines your value to the company. If it is good, they can be as "whiny" as they want, as long as the employer needs them.
As long as those employees don't want to advance and enjoy some of the added benefits that come with advancement such as bigger paychecks, then let them. As a business owner, I wouldn't expect them to work beyond their job description, but those that don't put forth the extra effort (many of which are the younger generation) can watch their peers turn into bosses. If they come and do the minimum, they will recieve the minimum. Confetti and birthday parties are not necessary just because the employee needs some special attention. You want special attention? Go somewhere else. It was my understanding that we were discussing those that expect to get special treatments just because they belong to the business. Those are the whiney brats I was referring to.
SCUBA, I don't know what your company does... but I think you're missing the mark when it comes to this thread, and I also believe that the articles in the beginning missed it.
The
facts are that in today's economy, performance is the key to success. It has little to do with the number of hours of face time you employ.
Check this article out.
http://www.jimpinto.com/writings/compensation.htmlHere's another:
http://www.compensationresources.com/press...-workforce-.phpThe basic premise is that it's what the output is that dictates who gets promoted.
I
USED TO buy into the "long hours" and "late nights" mantra. At times, it's important to understand that long hours = production. However, sometimes working smarter = production.
The reality is that in today's economy, knowledge is just as important as motivation. If you're competent with your industry's technology, sometimes you can make a good living working less. Get it? There were 60-70 hr weeks in my life, and sometimes there still are... but they're rare. I'd put my paycheck up against most on this board and I usually only work 37-42 hrs/week. (but I travel, etc.... so if that counts as work I work more...)
Generation Y is well geared to just this. It's not about whining or sniveling. It's about why people hire Gen Y employees. They have to. Gen Y employees have the skills they need.
I wouldn't ever even mention that they won't get promoted or start their own businesses. Who do you think does a large portion of web hosting and multimedia advertising? We use a guy in NJ that works from his garage, I know he has 3 other big clients (we do business with them too), and by what we pay he probably makes a very good living in his boxer shorts. Why? He knows how to use internet marketing to get results.
I believe that this is the basic recipe for success.
I think what you have to rid yourself of, period, is employees that do the
minimum. Because a kid shows up at 830 in a wrinkly shirt and no stays in the collar doesn't make him a bad sales person/tech guru/network administrator/etc-whatever. My guys are really all over the board, from all over the nation and all over the age brackets. There is no "demographic" that makes for a successful employee. Race, age, nationality, yankee or southerner... all play a part but can be molded into a building success.
What matters most for managers is to understand that if you are worried about the wrinkly shirt and no collar stays, about being tardy, etc (all as euphamisms for Gen Y employees)... maybe you're gonna sacrifice something in hiring someone that fits those molds. You can ask a kid to dress a little better for a big meeting, but can you teach an older man to be technically savvy as easily? No. Of course not.
Industrial production and other non-skilled situations probably have a hard time with these kids. Sure- I feel frustrated walking into Home Depot asking for help (and my father works for the darn company). Whatever. I also wanted to kick something when I was in there a few months ago and asked the dude who was about 50 to print off a wedding registry, and it took like 20 min for him to figure out how it worked.
There's a
good reason that some of our nation's largest companies have outsourced technical help. It's expensive and cumbersome to start operations abroad. They did it because in many cases, they couldn't get quality and efficient help here. It's our job to mold our children (and employees) into "good help". Many of these kids have what it takes, but you just can't approach them and act like they're 55 and have the same mentality.
Which leads me to my final point... I just thought of it.
Why does anyone think that telecommunting has become prevalent???
Well- because it works. It makes for happy employees who are often times as or more efficient (if you have a good employee).
I have a guy in Vancouver, a guy in DC, and a lady in Seattle who rarely go to the office (DC and Seattle have offices with admins in them... so they go occasionally). Why? They don't have to. They go see customers, etc... but only in the office a few times/month. I have not a clue how many hrs they work. At the end of the month, we talk turkey on $$$, and production. That's it. If they don't make it, they know that they won't have a job. Guess what? They do very well and love it. Two out of 3 are under 30. It's a win-win-win scenario.