QUOTE(DaffyGrl @ Jan 31 2008, 05:59 PM)

and Welsh rabbit (or rarebit), which is neither Welsh nor rabbit. What’s up wit dat?

QUOTE(bucket @ Jan 31 2008, 06:57 PM)

I had always thought the name Welsh Rabbit was a slight to the Welsh, but everyone always uses rarebit nowadays.
Bucket is right; this is just another (not very) veiled English insult against the Welsh (like all the sheep gags). The joke(!) is that the medieval Welsh were so poor that cheese on toast was the closest they could get to eating rabbit (which, unlike in the last two or three centuries, was not free-roaming peasant food in the UK, but a prized delicacy of the Normam aristocracy).
"Welching" on a bet or a deal is another such insult. It isn't used much in the UK any more - presumably because there are too many Welsh people around who'd take exception to it - but has survived in American English.
QUOTE
Just for the record all food will eventually spoil.
Except honey, apparently. Something to do with the high sugar concentrations osmotically destroying all bacteria or fungi that try to grow on or in it. A book of trivia I read recently said that ancient Greek and Egyptian honey found in intact jars is as good as the day it was stored.
QUOTE
I thought of another.... In Europe and I would imagine other countries too, they sell eggs right off the shelf, not refrigerated.
Yup. So in the USA they are sold from chiller cabinets? Why?
QUOTE(carlitoswhey @ Jan 31 2008, 10:38 PM)

The only food myth that bugs me is that going vegan / vegetarian is automatically good for you.
Yup. And even if they don't try to convert you, they're still really smug about it.
*controversial views follow* Vegetarianism (especially) is a crock, ethically speaking. What would happen to all the farm animals if the whole world turned veggie? Er, they'd be slaughtered as pests, not sent to cosy retirement paddocks to live out their years in some rural idyll.
And most vegetarians eat eggs, but do they realise that across the whole egg industry -
including free range - the male chicks are gassed as soon as they are identified because they are economically useless as live birds? Which, given that most laying varieties are bred so that the male and female chicks are different colours, happens at the cute fluffy cheep-cheep stage. And that most thickened sauces (but especially mayonnaise) and many prepared foods contain battery farmed egg derivatives? But hey, they don't eat meat, and are therefore operating on a higher moral plane than the rest of the human race.
Despite the fact that, as omnivores, humans
can survive and thrive on an all vegetable diet (just as dogs can), have you ever noticed how many vegetarians & vegans keep pet cats? Cats are pure carnivores and will die if they don't get to feast on the flesh of dead things, whether that be canned or packet catfood, or the neighbourhood mice and birds. Oh well, high moral stances are all well and good for other people, but little kitty has to have fresh kills.
And despite the fact that vegetarianism is far from the natural state of humans - we are omnivores, like chimpanzees, not vegetarians like gorillas. It's why our vermiform appendix is tiny and vestigial and not a great big bag of fermenting vegetation. It's why vegetarians take vitamin supplements - we need to get vitamins in our diets that truly vegetarian species would (or rather that their gut flora would) manufacture inside their bodies. (The cat family require certain vitamins that we don't need in our diet; our gut flora make them for us. That's why cats die if we try to make them fully vegetarian; the only current source of these feline vitamins is meat and meat products.)
To my mind the most ethical food standpoint is to eat meat in moderation (i.e. once or twice per week, rather than as the mainstay of every meal) and to take an active interest in where the animals came from and how they were raised and slaughtered. If we all did this, factory farming would become a thin of the past, and with it the necessary population of livestock would shrink to levels where the higher land areas required to raise them would become sustainable again (i.e. we wouldn't have to cut down rainforests to raise beef cattle to keep burger prices below a dollar. And the burgers would taste better, to boot.).
/sermon over.
(Apologies to any offence caused to bunny huggers in the

community. But you're still wrong

)
QUOTE(bucket @ Feb 1 2008, 01:09 AM)

Or that some wines use bull's blood as a clarifier.
Many wines and (I think) most beers (at least most ales) use something called isinglass finings to remove particles of leftover yeast, unfermented vegetable matter, and other impurities and clarify the beverage. Isinglass is
fish gelatine.
The biggest food myths, though, are that industrialised food production is a neutral or good thing (despite rising obesity levels in every country that has industrialised their food production); that the artificially cheap food that comes from this industrialised production is some kind of basic right (meat cheap enough to eat at every meal is not only of lower quality and flavour than traditionally reared and matured meat, but it's not good for us); and that the solution to this is not a wholesale reform of the entire agricultural and food industries to go back to basic principles of animal husbandry, but instead to create yet another set of multi-billion dollar industries based on short term weight loss (dieting and cosmetic surgery).