Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Joe Darby speaks
America's Debate > In the News > War on Terrorism
Google
Mrs. Pigpen
Joe Darby, most will probably remember, was the informant "whistle blower" who handed over the notorious Abu Ghraib photos to a commanding officer. He speaks about Abu Ghraib for the first time in an interview here. He challenges the assertion that Janis Karpinski was simply a good soldier obeying orders and a scapegoat for her commanding officers. We've had some rather involved and heated discussions on this issue in the past. He also gives testimony of overt (CIA or similar agency) abuse.

QUOTE
Everybody thinks there was an order from high up, or that somebody in command must have known. Everybody is wrong. Nobody in command knew about the abuse, because nobody in command cared enough to find out. That was the real problem. The entire command structure was oblivious, living in their own little worlds. So it wasn’t a conspiracy—it was negligence, plain and simple. They were all *expletive* clueless.

The general in charge of the prison was Janis Karpinski, but that didn’t mean she was ever there. To actually lay eyes on Karpinski took an act of God. She spent all her time in Kuwait or in the Green Zone Palace. She kept her happy *expletive* in the nice, safe places. The only time she’d come by was when a dignitary was visiting. She’d fly in a half hour before they got there, get briefed, lead the tour, and then fly back out. Other than that, she had no idea what was going on. I guess she didn’t like being in an overcrowded, violent prison with constant mortar fire coming in. In the five months I was at Abu Ghraib, I only saw her twice.

*snip*

I’ll say this, too: The abuse started earlier than anybody realizes. Nobody has ever said that publicly, but there were things going on before our unit even got there. The day we arrived, back in October of 2003, we were getting a tour of the compound and we saw like fifteen prisoners sitting in their cells in women’s underwear. This was day one; nobody from our unit had ever set foot in the prison. We asked the MPs in charge—the Seventy-second, out of Las Vegas—why the prisoners were wearing panties. They told us that it was a corrective action, that these guys had been mortaring the compound. So probably the MPs decided to mess with these guys. This stuff was going on before we arrived. After we took over, it basically just escalated.

The other thing was, there were other government agencies who would come into the prison and handle prisoners. I can’t say which agencies, but you can probably guess. Sometimes we didn’t know exactly who they were. We’d get a call at like three in the morning from the battalion commander, saying, “You have a bird coming in. You need to take prisoner such and such from cell whatever to the landing zone in fifteen minutes.” So I’d put my gear on, cuff the prisoner, bag him, go to the LZ, wait for the helicopter to land, and then hand the prisoner off to the guys inside. I didn’t know who they were. Didn’t ask. When they tell you not to ask any questions, you don’t ask questions. They might bring the prisoner back in a few hours, or the next morning, or two days later. You didn’t ask. Other times, they would bring a new prisoner into the compound. You didn’t know who they were, or who the prisoner was, or what he had done, or what they were going to do to him. You just handed over the cellblock. One night, this Black Hawk landed at about 4 a.m., and a couple guys came in with a prisoner and took him to tier 1, put sheets up so that nobody could see, and spent the rest of the night in there. They told us to stay away, so we did. Then a couple hours later, they came back out. They were like, “The prisoner is dead.” They asked for ice to pack him, and then they said, “You guys clean this up. We weren’t here. Have a good day.” Got back on the bird and took off, left the dead body right there. Those guys can come in and kill a guy, and there’s nothing you can do. There’s no record of them. They were never there. They don’t exist.


Darby also provides a sad account of how he was treated, particularly after his name was released to the public. The situation was egregiously handled, from his description.

Questions:

1) Does this article/ should this article dispel rumors of upper-echelon commanders ordering the abuse?

2) Should the names of such whistle blowers be released to the public?

3) Other thoughts on what has been revealed in this article?
Google
Ted
Questions:

1) Does this article/ should this article dispel rumors of upper-echelon commanders ordering the abuse?

Yes.

2) Should the names of such whistle blowers be released to the public?

That depends. If it helps get the truth out then yes otherwise no.

3) Other related thoughts?

Janis Karpinski paid the price for the negligence in her command. I would still like to know the “agency” that brought back the dead prisioner.
Dontreadonme
1) Does this article/ should this article dispel rumors of upper-echelon commanders ordering the abuse?

Either 'upper-echelon Commanders' knew of the abuse, or they were criminally negligent in allowing OGA's (Other Government Agencies) a free hand without oversight. I find it highly improbable that Karpinski or her supervisors were not aware of the actions of CIA, Titan and CACI interrogators. She may have been told not to interfere and to look the other way, but no OGA is going to come into a military facility without the knowledge of the Chain of Command. Not going to happen.

Darby's article was interesting, but the style of his writing leads me to believe that he speaks as many lower enlisted do, from his perspective. And his perspective is not necessarily the most knowledgeable. In his capacity as an Army Reserve MP, he is not in a position to make the statement "You have to understand, we were the most heavily mortared compound in Iraq. From the day we got there until the day I left, nobody took more mortars than we did. Nobody." He makes some salient points in the article concerning negligence, but he is a 'Joe' who is venting, and venting from the view of a lower enlisted soldier. Some of his tales are outright fabrications, but not even relevant to the abuse scandal.

The Abu Ghraib abuse was deplorable and unprofessional in the extreme. Darby, though bypassing his Chain of Command, did the honorable thing by bringing it to light, but he appears to be trying to extend his 15 minutes of fame with this article.
CruisingRam
1) Does this article/ should this article dispel rumors of upper-echelon commanders ordering the abuse?

Uh, no. To expand on DTOM- they basically had to put thier fingers in thier ears and close thier eyes while yelling "la la la la"- this is not innocent ignorance- this is purposely turning a blind eye.

This makes it a POLICY issue- in other words- the civilian leadership and the CIA needs to be hauled in front of congress and forced to answer questions and then charged with crimes and jailed.

2) Should the names of such whistle blowers be released to the public?

ONly if they choose to do it- not smart, but thier right.

3) Other thoughts on what has been revealed in this article?

That we need to call the CIA or "other agencies" in front of congress, publically, charge them with murder and execute them publically. We need to send a messiage to "other agencies" that they are not above the law, nor will thier secrecy be allowed to stay secret, and there is no such thing as "national security" being used as an excuse to murder.

We have allowed too much power to these secretive agencies, and they are running amok.
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.