QUOTE
Some of them are victims of what they have been taught, but they ultimately are the ones who prioritize sexual appeal above intelligence. There's no reason that women can't have both.
Exactly what I was trying to say in the other thread, except..that society often teaches to prioritize sexual appeal or beauty above intelligence in women, going way back to when they are little girls. Think about this, when you see a little boy, you compliment him in such ways as, what a big boy you are, what a smart little boy, what a strong little man. With girls its usually , how pretty you look, such a lovely little girl, arent you sweet, such a little lady, etc.
I remember having some serious thoughts when I saw friends of mine who had a little girl of 5 y/o, who had recently met a little boy and it was clear the 2 had become friends. The adults were saying to her, are you gonna marry Johnny? I am absolutley positive this was not occurring with the boys parents. We do these things without thinking.
For the longest time I have seen little girls dressed in impossible play clothes and shoes. I have always thought, why dont they put some real runaround clothes on that girl so she can play right?
I am always shocked at lesbian jokes aimed at political or activist females. Hillary Clinton is not a macho female. She is well dressed and always looks feminine, yet through the Clinton years lesbian jokes abounded. (Must have been a vast right wing conspiracy) A man had never been called Iron Britches, in the case of Maggie Thatcher, while questioning her husbands masculinity because of his marriage to a powerful woman. Feminists have endured lesbian commentary since the beginning. Not to be redundant from my other post.
All well and good that the men who have responded here seem to enjoy intelligent women, however to what extent? My personal relationships have tolerated my interest in politics and classic literature, education and pet projects, as long as it does not interfere with getting attention from me when they want or need it which seems to be often. It has appeared that my interests are all good as long as he is priority, if not, we can have some serious problems. Only as I got older did I begin to care less what men think, but that doesnt go for a young lady in her 20's and 30's who would really like a partner.
In corporate life there are many lovely women who find themselves single in their 40's because their lifestyle and carreer have been intimidating or too demmanding. I personally have seen educated, white collar men cringe when politics is brought up to discussion by women. Its as if they feel like they are suddenly going to get creamed and would really rather avoid it.
My women friends have talked about certain things we do not do, not to bruise the ego. For example, you see a man or group of men trying to do a particular job and with one small change the whole thing would go a bit more smoothly, but you refrain from mentioning it, just to keep the peace, and not to be called a bitch behind your back. You just let them take the long way around. I can laugh at this now, but in my younger days I saw no reason for the pretense. I got called a bossy bitch alot, and sometimes still.
IE: Never interfere with a man working on a car!
Now that is for all of us who are attractive and smart. How about less attractive, smart women? Isnt there some predudice against them? A man can be fat and/or very unattractive, but he can well hold his own in business and debate, his looks are never questioned, where-as a woman might be subject to comments like, 'shes intelligent, capable, but hard to look at'. (to be mild).
I have asked many men what exactly their women do for a living, or what their hobbies are, and they really dont know! 'Something in a hospital, or some sort of music thing.'..can be the responses.
This is not a male bash, nor do I pretend that love for beauty is not a human trait for both sexes. Neither do I think you can readily change societies mores, especially on certain ingrained ideas. (Since weve been trying since way before Stanton, sheesh)
Initially we were talking about American ignorance. Since I was small I had a good brain, I asked alot of questions and took in concepts rather well. I believed that girls and boys were both able to do anything they wanted, until I learned that being a girl meant I wasnt allowed to do a bunch of things, and had responsability for all kinds of things boys didnt. (An old Mexican saying, watch your chickens because my roosters are running free.)?
At one time I decided it wasnt all that important, neither did it help me to have a brain, I was supposed to have a body and face. I am sure Im not the only little girl to get this idea. Naturally at a point in life you have to recover your brain, hopefully before its too late. This can still be disconcerting to your parents or society, who wonder why at 42 you never got married, and you cant explain that maybe you never wanted to or had other things on your mind.

In recent years many have worked hard to encourage girls in math, science and sports, as well as helping a parent when they work on the car or the house. Boys have to do dishes and laundry and house chores. No longer are the days when girls only get an education so that they could catch a good husband, and lo and behold, after much fighting, we have sports scholarships for girls and womens pro-sports. We have come a long way, but listening to women and girls, and mostly giving them room to be opinionated and engage fully is still far off.
I hope I have not strayed the topic.