While
cyan can certainly speak for herself, I'd like to comment, since I too am somewhat a fan of Taoism -- the religion referenced by
cyan.
Taoism doesn't really point to any
supreme being but rather to reality, and all entities within it, being part of a web. The Tao Te Ching, for example, mentions a "Great Mother" which seems to indicate some kind of supreme being. But yet, throughout, people are also referred to as "masters." The
being of the Great Mother is not perceived to be separate from anything else, nor in anyway superior.
QUOTE
11
We join spokes together in a wheel,
but it is the center hole
that makes the wagon move.
We shape clay into a pot,
but it is the emptiness inside
that holds whatever we want.
We hammer wood for a house,
but it is the inner space
that makes it livable.
We work with being,
but non-being is what we use.
With Taoism, it's essentially pluralism and equality. The wood and tools for the house are no better and no less than the empty space within it. The "unnamable" force of the tao is no greater or less than the entities within it, if even they are within it, since all things are also perceived to
be the tao.
As far as agnosticism goes, I'm actually atheist via agnosticism. I can't say for sure that there isn't a god of some sort, but I choose not to accept it myself. Agnostics, in my experience, tend to say that there
is some higher power, but they can't identify it, so they don't subscribe to any particular interpretations of such a being. Atheists can hold spiritual views (such as Taoism) that hold to a more
egalitarian philosophy without any higher, supreme entity. I see this as being distinguished from agnosticism.
QUOTE
5
The Tao doesn't take sides;
it gives birth to both good and evil.
The Master doesn't take sides;
she welcomes both saints and sinners.
The Tao is like a bellows:
it is empty yet infinitely capable.
The more you use it, the more it produces;
the more you talk of it, the less you understand.
Hold on to the center.