Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: America's promise means nothing.
America's Debate > Archive > Policy Debate Archive > [A] Foreign Policy
Pages: 1, 2
Google
Madtown
jiandeng

Why do you want to be here in a country you think is so bad?

MT sad.gif
Google
Alan Wood
QUOTE(Madtown @ Nov 9 2002, 06:49 AM)
jiandeng

Why do you want to be here in a country you think is so bad?

MT sad.gif

MT.

All he/she is doing is asking questions and stating a point of view which is everybodys right in a free country.
Questioning does not nessessarily indicate a lack of love for where we live wheras unconditional acceptance indicates a fear of seeing its faults.
Much more comfortable!.

'If you dont like the heat, get out of the kitchen' remarks dont answer his/her queries it simply throws the ball back over the net.

Regards...Alan
Madtown
I didn't think I was making an "If you don't like the heat get out of the kitchen remark." I was just asking her/him a question, but I probably should have phrased it differently. I didn't mean to sound harsh.

I apologize.

I have reread her/his post and if I thought a country was as bad as she/he says, I would stay away. So many come here and do nothing but criticize.

What about all the good stuff here?

MT
Alan Wood
QUOTE(Madtown @ Nov 9 2002, 09:49 PM)
What about all the good stuff here?

MT

MT.

I didnt think that jiangdeng was referring to the beautiful country of America, rather the not-so-beautiful results of various Administrations foreign policy.

Certainly, as far as I am concerned, America is a vibrant, young nation and like every nation contains folks of every thinking.

However, I also have problems understanding the short term convoluted thinking that appears to govern American foreign policy.
So often it has come back to bite America.

Others have done it before but we are living it.

Regards.....Alan
Jerry
cool.gif This board covers quite a few points and opens quite a few areas. Sadly, I happen to be an American and I am among those who are said to have had an election last week. And it wasn't a real election. We were confronted with a very limited choice between democratic politicians who wanted a war and republican politicians who wanted a war. No one asked us flat out if we wanted to go to war. No one asked us if wanna send $10 billion to the madman Sharon. We were simply manipulated as usual and told what a wonderful free country it is.

In with regard to American imperialism I would take umbrage at the the contention that America's adventure in Indochina was not imperialist. It was palpably imperialist. There was no question about it. Everyone knew it. The Vietnamese especially knew it and it took them twenty years to throw the Americans out of their country. The Americans have displayed their penchant for imperialism also in Kosovo to get a foothold in the Balkans which as everyone knows is a very strategic location. American imperialism raised its ugly head in Somalia but the Somalis quickly threw them out of their country. American imperialism showed up in Lebanon both through Israeli aggression from the south and American shelling from the sea. We also saw American imperialism when Reagan sent a mercenary army into Nicaragua.

The current circumstance is a ham handed oil grab being mounted against the Republic of Iraq, which is a member of the U.N. Bush and his Nazi henchman have tried to demonize the president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein and turn it into a personal vendetta. But everyone knows that it's nothing but an oil grab. The whole world knows it. Even Bush's obedient stooge media are having trouble covering it. So they simply avoid the subject and rant on in repetitious tirades against Saddam Hussein. Except it's an oil grab folks; it's an oil grab. ohmy.gif
Darcaine
QUOTE(Jerry @ Nov 11 2002, 04:22 PM)
cool.gif This board covers quite a few points and opens quite a few areas. Sadly, I happen to be an American and I am among those who are said to have had an election last week.  And it wasn't a real election.  We were confronted with a very limited choice between democratic politicians who wanted a war and republican politicians who wanted a war.  No one asked us flat out if we wanted to go to war.  No one asked us if wanna send $10 billion to the madman Sharon.  We were simply manipulated as usual and told what a wonderful free country it is. 

In with regard to American imperialism I would take umbrage at the the contention that America's adventure in Indochina was not imperialist.  It was palpably imperialist.  There was no question about it.  Everyone knew it. The Vietnamese especially knew it and it took them twenty years to throw the Americans out of their country. The Americans have displayed their penchant for imperialism also in Kosovo to get a foothold in the Balkans which as everyone knows is a very strategic location. American imperialism raised its ugly head in Somalia but the Somalis quickly threw them out of their country. American imperialism showed up in Lebanon both through Israeli aggression from the south and American shelling from the sea. We also saw American imperialism when Reagan sent a mercenary army into Nicaragua.

The current circumstance is a ham handed oil grab being mounted against the Republic of Iraq, which is a member of the U.N. Bush and his Nazi henchman have tried to demonize the president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein and turn it into a personal vendetta. But everyone knows that it's nothing but an oil grab. The whole world knows it.  Even Bush's obedient stooge media are having trouble covering it.  So they simply avoid the subject and rant on in repetitious tirades against Saddam Hussein.  Except it's an oil grab folks; it's an oil grab.   ohmy.gif

Wow Jerry...don't have kids. Geesh, and we wonder why the IQ scores are dropping.

Darcaine
Alan Wood
QUOTE(Darcaine @ Nov 11 2002, 05:36 PM)
Wow Jerry...don't have kids.  Geesh, and we wonder why the IQ scores are dropping.

Darcaine

Darcaine.

Disparaging one liners are hardly an argument for a case and are indicative of the 'warhawk' philosophy ie:........."If they dont like what I want, nukem".


Regards...Alan
MOUSE
QUOTE(Jerry @ Nov 11 2002, 03:22 PM)
cool.gif This board covers quite a few points and opens quite a few areas. Sadly, I happen to be an American and I am among those who are said to have had an election last week.  And it wasn't a real election.  We were confronted with a very limited choice between democratic politicians who wanted a war and republican politicians who wanted a war.  No one asked us flat out if we wanted to go to war.  No one asked us if wanna send $10 billion to the madman Sharon.  We were simply manipulated as usual and told what a wonderful free country it is. 

In with regard to American imperialism I would take umbrage at the the contention that America's adventure in Indochina was not imperialist.  It was palpably imperialist.  There was no question about it.  Everyone knew it. The Vietnamese especially knew it and it took them twenty years to throw the Americans out of their country. The Americans have displayed their penchant for imperialism also in Kosovo to get a foothold in the Balkans which as everyone knows is a very strategic location. American imperialism raised its ugly head in Somalia but the Somalis quickly threw them out of their country. American imperialism showed up in Lebanon both through Israeli aggression from the south and American shelling from the sea. We also saw American imperialism when Reagan sent a mercenary army into Nicaragua.

The current circumstance is a ham handed oil grab being mounted against the Republic of Iraq, which is a member of the U.N. Bush and his Nazi henchman have tried to demonize the president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein and turn it into a personal vendetta. But everyone knows that it's nothing but an oil grab. The whole world knows it.  Even Bush's obedient stooge media are having trouble covering it.  So they simply avoid the subject and rant on in repetitious tirades against Saddam Hussein.  Except it's an oil grab folks; it's an oil grab.   ohmy.gif

What do you mean no one asked you? You had an election. If you can't find candidates who agree with you then it is not an election? Oh please. That is just physo-babble and a loser's limp. Get out there and run yourself if you aren't happy. You are one of many who do nothing but gripe if things don't go their way. Did you campaign for what you thought was right? Did you write your congressmen & Senators? I would be very interested to know.
Alan Wood
QUOTE(Jerry @ Nov 11 2002, 04:22 PM)
The current circumstance is a ham handed oil grab being mounted against the Republic of Iraq, which is a member of the U.N. Bush and his Nazi henchman have tried to demonize the president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein and turn it into a personal vendetta. But everyone knows that it's nothing but an oil grab. The whole world knows it.  Even Bush's obedient stooge media are having trouble covering it.  So they simply avoid the subject and rant on in repetitious tirades against Saddam Hussein.  Except it's an oil grab folks; it's an oil grab.   ohmy.gif

Of course its an oil grab.
A rose by any other name is still a rose.
The American balance of payements is in the biggest poo in its history and the general public is suffering from a distinct lack of information regarding it.

The Administration is hopeing and praying Saddam wont agree to the UN conditions, and if he does, he breaks them at some stage.
If he does comply and sticks to it what then?.
Another excuse for attacking?.

Time will tell and fortunatly for the politicions comfy-cozy people have short memories.

But I believe there is more to it than that.
Iraq is a major threat to Israel and its expansionist policy in the Arab world.
It already has missiles that can reach Tel Aviv and although Israel now has an anti-missile system it cant stop them all.
Taking Iraq out of the game is very much in their interests.

Regards...Alan
Darcaine
QUOTE(Alan Wood @ Nov 11 2002, 09:15 PM)
QUOTE(Jerry @ Nov 11 2002, 04:22 PM)
The current circumstance is a ham handed oil grab being mounted against the Republic of Iraq, which is a member of the U.N. Bush and his Nazi henchman have tried to demonize the president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein and turn it into a personal vendetta. But everyone knows that it's nothing but an oil grab. The whole world knows it.  Even Bush's obedient stooge media are having trouble covering it.  So they simply avoid the subject and rant on in repetitious tirades against Saddam Hussein.  Except it's an oil grab folks; it's an oil grab.   ohmy.gif

Of course its an oil grab.
A rose by any other name is still a rose.
The American balance of payements is in the biggest poo in its history and the general public is suffering from a distinct lack of information regarding it.

The Administration is hopeing and praying Saddam wont agree to the UN conditions, and if he does, he breaks them at some stage.
If he does comply and sticks to it what then?.
Another excuse for attacking?.

Time will tell and fortunatly for the politicions comfy-cozy people have short memories.

But I believe there is more to it than that.
Iraq is a major threat to Israel and its expansionist policy in the Arab world.
It already has missiles that can reach Tel Aviv and although Israel now has an anti-missile system it cant stop them all.
Taking Iraq out of the game is very much in their interests.

Regards...Alan

Everyome plaese re-read Alan's lies upon lies. How much you want to bet he runs out now to find some wacko's web url to support his statements! LMFAO.

Darcaine

"Ah, it's good to have a life!"
Google
Jaime
Darcaine - could you articulate exactly what you feel are Alan's lies? Your blanket statement makes it hard for us to debate anything.
Darcaine
QUOTE(Jaime @ Nov 11 2002, 11:39 PM)
Darcaine - could you articulate exactly what you feel are Alan's lies?  Your blanket statement makes it hard for us to debate anything.

Jaime, what would be the point of articulating that mash of garbage. I would simply point out they are all lies and then Alan would go on to some other crime by the US (he thinks) the US is doing. He has done this in every other forum.

Darcaine
Jaime
QUOTE(Darcaine @ Nov 12 2002, 07:45 AM)
Jaime,  what would be the point of articulating that mash of garbage.

Because this is a debate site biggrin.gif

If we don't ask to hear other's reasonings behind their arguments what's the point of debating?
Wertz
I, too, would like a bit of articulation here. At Darcaine's request, I did re-read Alan's post - and I'm still not sure to which fact or facts Darcaine takes exception. To "simply point out they are all lies" is no more convincing than making the initial blanket statement that his post consisted of "lies upon lies". Name-calling is easy, Darcaine - is there anything in Alan's posting you'd actually like to refute?
Darcaine
QUOTE(Wertz @ Nov 12 2002, 12:23 PM)
I, too, would like a bit of articulation here. At Darcaine's request, I did re-read Alan's post - and I'm still not sure to which fact or facts Darcaine takes exception. To "simply point out they are all lies" is no more convincing than making the initial blanket statement that his post consisted of "lies upon lies". Name-calling is easy, Darcaine - is there anything in Alan's posting you'd actually like to refute?

Please elaborate on name calling Wertz? Saying someone is lying is not name calling. Now, if Alan was "mentally handicapped" then I would be lying because Alan could not be responsible for what he is saying. But, I digress...sigh here we go...

"Of course its an oil grab."

How many oil fields do we control in the middle east Alan? Score one Darcaine.

"The American balance of payements is in the biggest poo in its history and the general public is suffering from a distinct lack of information regarding it."

Another attempt to make the US look like a debtor Nation. The US IS this year in a deficiet this year but, one only needs to look at what is really going on with US treasuries to see what the debt really is. The payback on the debt was really almost as much as the US could really do when you take in to account US bonds and such. As for the US not paying..methinks Alan need to look for better info. So Alan, care to try again? Score 2 Darcaine.

"The Administration is hopeing and praying Saddam wont agree to the UN conditions, and if he does, he breaks them at some stage.
If he does comply and sticks to it what then?.
Another excuse for attacking?."

So, Alan is God now. Listening to GW's prayers and reading his mind. Excuse for attacking? How about the war we fought and the agreements that man signed...hmmm? Score 3 Darcaine

"But I believe there is more to it than that.
Iraq is a major threat to Israel and its expansionist policy in the Arab world."

Ah the truth...a belief system rather than a factual one. I can buy that. If Israel really had wanted to conqure their neighbors they would have done so years ago. So once again you are wrong. Score 4 Darcaine.

So after all that Darcaine 4 Alan 0. I would say that pretty comes to the point.

Darcaine
Alan Wood
Darcaine wins hands down...........

I cant compete with his rationalism or "one track acceptance".

I give in cool.gif cool.gif cool.gif

Regards.........Alan
Wertz
Darcaine: To me, accusing someone of posting "lies upon lies" is tantamount to characterizing them as a liar. And that, again to my way of thinking, is name-calling. Am I missing something?
IWC.JASONASHLEY63
Tantamount? I have not reached that word in my last 20 years of exsistance. Must reflects the education I recieve here in Iowa.

The U.S knew Sadaam would not agree to the terms...No hoping in it. Bush and the puppeteers are ready for war...I'm young but I won't be drafted...If the leader of the nation feels it is necessary then it's necessary.

Hate to see Darcaine win by such a large margin Alan. Come with some meat next time you want to make happy.gif a sandwich.
Alan Wood
QUOTE(IWC.JASONASHLEY63 @ Nov 15 2002, 06:45 PM)
Hate to see Darcaine win by such a large margin Alan. Come with some meat next time you want to make happy.gif  a sandwich.

It didnt matter how many times, or how much meat I put in the sandwiches (as in other posts) it would still be called "garbage".

There is no reasoning with the unreasonable.

That last post was, I am afraid, sarcasm by me.

Regards.......Alan
jjirout
Automobiles - who needs 'em anyway!

Industries - dependent on oil - shut 'em down!

To hell with the rest of the world.

Bury your heads in the sand!

Alan for President!


jjirout
Alan Wood
QUOTE(jjirout @ Nov 19 2002, 06:42 PM)
Automobiles - who needs 'em anyway!

Industries - dependent on oil - shut 'em down!

To hell with the rest of the world.

Bury your heads in the sand!

Alan for President!


jjirout

Now.......the questions are these!!!!!

Which World leader wants to bury heads AND in who's sand?????.

And as for "To hell with the rest of the World" I wonder which World leader intimated that??.

No way could I ever be President.......I would ask myself too many awkward questions I didnt want to hear wub.gif wub.gif .

Regards....Alan
Rancid Uncle
Agent Orange isn't a chemical weapon
Momof3
Ranciduncle, What that agent orange have to do with the price of eggs?????? wacko.gif wacko.gif wacko.gif
Momof3
Sorry what does agent orange have to do with the price of eggs??? blink.gif blink.gif blink.gif
Danya
QUOTE(Darcaine @ Nov 11 2002, 10:40 PM)
QUOTE
Everyome plaese re-read Alan's lies upon lies.  How much you want to bet he runs out now to find some wacko's web url to support his statements! LMFAO.



Hi, this is my first post here. It is true that you can find whatever opinion you are looking for on the web. This just means you have to look a little harder for the truth. It isn't fun but when you can't depend on your television network media to report all of the news, or if they report opinion disguised as fact you have to start doing some research and think for yourself. If you depend on Fox or NBC you are only getting less than half of the news that is happening.

One suggestion for Alan when dealing with people that simply disregard your understanding of policy/history/conclusions as being only lies is to be sure to post link a to your source when stating your points. It's a little harder for people to argue with, say, a U.S. Gov. site that backs up your stance on their own U.S. Policy for instance.

For Americans you will probably want to source Rueters or CNN and, to a lesser extent, The NY Times along with the WA. Post.(they will both put their own slant on the story in most cases but together they will give at least some of the facts) for current news. It would be nice if any opposing opinions were kind enough to do the same. If only to show they have made an attempt to look at facts before forming their superior opinions. sleep.gif
Alan Wood
[QUOTE=Danya,Nov 24 2002, 07:36 AM][QUOTE=Darcaine,Nov 11 2002, 10:40 PM][QUOTE] Everyome plaese re-read Alan's lies upon lies.  How much you want to bet he runs out now to find some wacko's web url to support his statements! LMFAO. [/QUOTE]

One suggestion for Alan when dealing with people that simply disregard your understanding of policy/history/conclusions as being only lies is to be sure to post link a to your source when stating your points. It's a little harder for people to argue with, say, a U.S. Gov. site that backs up your stance on their own U.S. Policy for instance.

[/QUOTE]
Danya.

I agree it is better to include sources for arguments and sometimes I do.
However there are those who read the sources and because it is not what they want to hear, immediatly proclaim them as invalid, or otherwise, without research.

To debate one must first have an opinion and, most importantly, be able to accept valid points put forward contrary to that opinion.

Debating is not a contest, nor is it a platform to force an opinion on others.
Primarily it provokes thought.

When you talk of offering US Govt sites that enhance my stance........perhaps they may be biased?.
Then again offering other sites to do it may be biased?.

Who knows what the truth is????.

But it provokes thought.

Regards.....Alan
HeatherRob
You are right, America will lie and cheat to win. Because America is right, so when we deal with countries like the old USSR, Iran, Iraq, Libya, we will use whatever means neccessary to ensure freedom wins out over tyranny, totalitarianism, communism, facism, in general all evil. I notice you don't mention the former USSR, or the fundamentalist Muslim countries like Iran, Yemen when mentioning cheating and lying. What do you think the Soviet Union did for 70 years? They killed about 30 million of their own people under a pyschopathic ruler(Papa Joe Stalin). What did they do in 1948, they blockaded Berlin, so being the liars and cheaters we are, we flew in food and medicine to Berliners, terrible aren't we? In Afghanistan, late 1970's, early 1980's, we supported the mujahadeen who were fighting the Soviets as the Kremlin invaded Afghanistan, intent on colonizing it. Under ROnald Reagan we gave huge amounts of money and arms to MUSLIMS to aid in their life or death battle against Soviet Russia. Man what evil doers we were. Of course their descendants eventually formed the Taliban, which aided Al-Queda in acts of terrorism. But did we go in and raze Kabul, Khandahar, no we kicked out the Taliban, who treated women like chattel and destroyed priceless historical treasures. And so on and so forth. Your inane babble about America's lying and cheating only serves to highlight the remarkable achievements the USA has made in protecting and supporting freedom in the last 50 years.
HeatherRob
QUOTE(Alan Wood @ Oct 1 2002, 03:44 AM)
Jaime/Turnea.

I DO NOT HATE AMERICANS.

Having said that let me enlarge on it.

In answer to Jaime.
My apparant disgust of Americans.

America gave a vibrancy to the World during the 60's to 80's when your products and style of life was embraced willingly.
I am well aware that some civillian Americans object to your involvement in external affairs.
I am also aware that you allowed your military to become so powerfull that it now appears to influence policy.
The reasons given for the huge expenditure of money on military, as they always are, throughout history, from the Romans to the British Empire, are explained away as a 'Force of arms nessessary to protect the Nation'.
It has NEVER been the case.
The military has always been used to expand frontiers, occupying by force and introducing their 'superior' way of life to those who had survived long before we were in existance.
The best way to make enemies.


In Answer to Turnea.

Your comment on insulting is accepted, my apologies if it appeared that way.

Point 1&2.

'Reds under the Beds' syndrome.
It was always reasonable to expect the Soviet economy to reach 'meltdown' at some stage.
The importation of foreign recources FAR outweighed their export ability.
Nobody wanted to be paid in roubles.
Concentration on military build-up and their desire to perpetuate Communism through the World helped the decay.

In a different context......may I suggest America is on course to do the same.
America is the worlds largest debtor.
The 'Gnomes of Zurich' and the World are tied into your economy.
You go down...we all do.
At the end of the fiscal year 2000 your balance of payements were $1.2 trillion in the red and increasing of which Approx 1/4 of your GNP was assigned to military.
WHY? do it.
Please feel free to check this, I may be a few million out.

Point 3.

I have to ask this when you talk about lives lost after American Nuclear Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagisaki.
WHO'S LIVES?.
Americans?
Please explain to me how you can EVER justify the tens of thousands Japanese civillians killed, and still dying.
Your civillians were never touched.
War IS brutal, I agree and it appears you changed the rules for ever.

Point 3/4.

You are right in reference to WW1.
The Germans and Allies used mustard gas.
NOT really chemical weapons more like lethal gas.
I cannot find any instance of Napalm being used during WW1 or WW2.
Please advise.

The US introduced the World to Chemical weapons with 'Agent Orange'.
defoliant of which Americans, Allies and Vietnamese are still having health problems.
The US used Napalm extesively during Vietnam despite your being a signatory against the use of it.
Again....you have made new rules.
All through history the'big sticks' bent the rules and you are no different.

Point 5.
In todays World.
You ARE dangerous to world peace.
So were the Germans and their 'big stick'.
So were the Soviets and their 'big stick'.
And now the US and their 'big stick'.

So it goes on  and on.
You are in a responsible position to stop it.

Do it, be you, be the Us with it's new things for us.

Regards.........Alan

Whoah, your facts are about as on target as an scud missile. The U.S. military get no where close to 25% of the US GNP. The two are totally unrelated. GNP is the total of all U.S. economic production. That number is in the hundreds of trillions. The U.S. military gets its money from the federal budget, which is about 1.3 trillion dollars. The U.S. military budget is 350 billion dollars give or take 20 billion. 25% of the U.S. GNP would be over 20 trillion dollars, I assure you our generals are not that well paid, heck we'd be driving fur lined tanks and shooting 18K gold rifles at those prices!!
Jaime
And where do you get your facts, HeatherRob? You have just spent two posts spouting unbacked statistics. What are your sources?
Danya
HeatherRob, I think you are part of a large portion of American's who have begun to think that the end justify any means. I don't agree with lying and cheating and throwing our values out the window whenever it suits us and I disagree that we do this all in the name of freedom and justice. That's just something that you tell yourself.

For instance, how can you be so proud of how we (inadvertently) helped women from life under the rules of the Taliban while the we equally flaunt our friendship with Pakistan, a country where many women are treated brutally as well? We are friendly with them because we want something, and as long as they are on our good side they can treat their people as bad as they like. Same goes for Turkey. I don't find much to brag about in that area because it's all self serving.
HeatherRob
QUOTE(Jaime @ Dec 15 2002, 01:54 AM)
And where do you get your facts, HeatherRob?  You have just spent two posts spouting unbacked statistics.  What are your sources?

Well Jaime, I do something crazy that you should try, it is called reading the newspaper. That's what intelligent people do. My facts about the U.S. defense budget and GNP are available in the annual federal budget each year. No classified documents there. The gentleman whose post I replied to was the one without the facts. I straigthened him out. He obviously had GNP and federal budget confused. SO where exactly are my unsubstantiated facts? As for my sources about U.S. invovlement in the 1948 Berlin Airlift, the help that we provided to muslim freedom fighters in Afghanistan, the Book "Reagan's WaR", BY Peter Schweitzer is an excellent source. If you are uninformed about the Berlin Airlift, you might want to brush up on your history, I can't be responsible for you not learning it like I did in high school.
HeatherRob
QUOTE(Danya @ Dec 15 2002, 03:23 AM)
HeatherRob, I think you are part of a large portion of American's who have begun to think that the end justify any means. I don't agree with lying and cheating and throwing our values out the window whenever it suits us and I disagree that we do this all in the name of freedom and justice. That's just something that you tell yourself.

For instance, how can you be so proud of how we (inadvertently) helped women from life under the rules of the Taliban while the we equally flaunt our friendship with Pakistan, a country where many women are treated brutally as well? We are friendly with them because we want something, and as long as they are on our good side they can treat their people as bad as they like. Same goes for Turkey. I don't find much to brag about in that area because it's all self serving.

Well Century Mark, I fail to see how spreading freedom around the world compromises our values. You see people like Oliver North, who was instrumental in helping anti-Marxist forces, as a criminal. But he was the one actually doing the dirty work, taking the risks, visiting hostile countries putting his life in danger to support anti-Soviet, anti-terrorist groups. While people like you criticize and get all self righteous, there have to be people who actually do what needs to be done. I have great respect for CIA, Special Forces personnel that place duty to country over family, personal comfort and life itself to fight evil all over the world. SO you can have your safe, back seat, don't get invovled values, I'll take the folks who do the dirty work that ensures the good guys stay in charge.
Danya
What 'good guys in charge'? And I'll take being self rightous over being a criminal, thanks. wink2.gif
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.