QUOTE(Eeyore @ Jun 26 2003, 07:45 PM)
At the very least it reduces the magnificence of the accomplishment that it posted like a press release in almost any discussion of his political biography.
Bushisms abound throughout the net. How long would it take for Bush to insult a foreign power with the level of knowledge he had about foreign policy upon entering office.
I take it since you only showered scorn on one of the six quotes I put up their that you agree that the other quotes reflect subpar comments from a president or a candidate for that office.
Okay, Eeyore, I'll answer the remaining five, briefly, since I've already done this once and my computer (Win98, blech!!) froze before committing the post.
QUOTE
Bush: About the Balkans, "I think it ought to be one of our priorities to work with our European friends to convince them to put troops on the ground."
Fact: "European forces already make up a large majority of the peacekeeping forces in Bosnia and Kosovo." Washington Post, 10/12/00
Read the full context of the debate. Also note that during the same debate Gore made some flubs of his own, for which he's been given a free pass.
QUOTE
Bush: "One of the problems we have in the military is we're in a lot of places around the world" and cited Haiti as an example.
"Though approximately 20,000 U.S. troops went to Haiti in 1994, as of late August this year, there were only 109 U.S. troops in Haiti and most were rotating through as part of an exercise." Washington Post, 10/12/00
From the same debate. Given that Bush was
factually correct, i.e. there
were US troops in Haiti at the time, what's the problem? It seems as though "if he's wrong about the facts, he's dumb. if he's right about the facts, he's wrong, ergo, he's dumb."
QUOTE
For a century and a half now, America and Japan have formed one of the great and enduring alliances of modern times," Bush declared in Tokyo on Feb. 18, 2002, apparently overlooking the Second World War in which his father was shot down by the Japanese military
You can go to the White House's website and read the full speech. You'll see that Bush used both the terms century and 'half century' multiple times. He flubbed. Nobody is claiming that he's the most articulate speaker in the world. Are you claiming that articulate speech is a prerequisite for intelligence? If not, then why persist in this line of argument?
QUOTE
Der Spiegel, the German newsmagazine, reported that Bush's ignorance of the world caused an embarrassing episode at a meeting with Brazil's President Fernando Henrique Cardoso. "Do you have blacks, too?" Bush blurted out to the Brazilian leader, Der Spiegel reported.
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, who is black, broke in. "Mr. President, Brazil probably has more blacks that the USA," said Rice. "Some say it's the country with the most blacks outside Africa." [Der Spiegel, May 28, 2002] Cardoso or one of his top aides apparently was the source of the quotes.
Snopes does this one better than I...
Urban Legends - Bush's BrazilQUOTE
"I've got very good relations with President Mubarak and Crown Prince Abdallah and the King of Jordan, Gulf Coast countries."—Washington, D.C., May 29, 2003
Another flub. There's legions of them out there, including some by those "highly intelligent" Democrats, and we won't even begin to get into the flubs that make up some of the most entertaining bits of television and movies, you know, the outtakes. Flubs by
professional actors.
Still no facts. But I hope that's enough scorn for you.... Frankly, after gutting and cleaning Bush Watch in my prior post, I can't imagine any
rational basis for you coming back for more. Which leaves us with naught but the irrational.
You want to denigrate his policies on their merits. Go ahead. You want to make the claim that Bush isn't the most articulate President we've ever had, go ahead, few will argue with you, because you'll have
facts on your side. Of course, it seems as though Reagan, who
was one of the most articulate, was also supposed to be "dumb". Moving target, anyone?
The point is, you want to make a claim that he's dumb, try using relevant facts to support your argument. That's all I ask. Not hearsay/urban legends, counterfactual misrepresentations, facts that
undermine your argument, and human flubs.