I can speak only for myself, but my answer to the question “Are men, whose greatest or only positive attribute (I’m assuming they’re also at least nice) is intelligence, considered attractive” is yes, yes, a thousand times yes!
I believe the Ayn Rand premise that the ‘man who is certain of his own value, wants the highest type of woman he can find’ holds true absolutely in reversed roles as well. The woman who is truly secure in herself wants the highest type of man. No one is defined (ultimately) by what they have in their bank account, or what they look like on the outside.
I grow weary of the company of dim men quickly, regardless of their less significant but better attributes. A stupid man is a complete turn off, even if he’s rich, buff, and handsome.
I like intellectual discourse. I enjoy playing strategy games with a person who challenges me. I want someone that I feel is intellectually superior to myself (although that certainly doesn’t mean they’re always right). If I were to rank the most important qualities for a relationship with a man (assuming the person is basically caring and nice), ranked in order from 10 being the most important to 1 being the least…10 intellect, 9 cute butt (just kidding), 8 intellect, 7 intellect, 6 humor, 5 reliable employment, 4 similar interests, 3 intellectual curiosity, 2 money, 1 looks (barring severe disfigurement or morbid obesity)
To give a direct example, from my life, of how important I consider intellect to be…
When I was at the University, this ROTC guy would sit next to me every day in physics class. It became annoying. No matter where I sat in the room of 500 people, he would find me. I was a granola nature type of girl, and the last thing I was interested in was a military man, with a crew cut!
Eventually, he convinced me to study with him. We met at the library and talked for hours about anything and everything, accept physics. Then I knew that the unassuming, unimpressive looking (his appearance has improved since then) guy was probably one of the smartest people I’d ever met. That did it for me. After about 3 months of study dates, we went on one real date. I moved in with him the next day. We were formally engaged 6 weeks later. At that time, I believed (erroneously) that I was going to be destitute for life as a military spouse. I believed (correctly) that it would be almost impossible for me to have a solid career of my own (which until that time was all-important to me) because of our moving and future locations. I also knew that I could have my own career, and the pick of pretty much any other man I might ever want (I wasn’t exactly ugly back then). It wasn’t even a decision for me.
Through the years, we’ve both changed in many ways. We’ve become closer and grown apart, but the primary thing I looked for in the beginning has survived. I am reminded of it every time we have a moment to sit down and have a conversation and every time he helps me consider the solution to a life problem. Similar to how a man might feel about his ‘trophy wife’, I feel about my husband because he is an intellectual giant compared to most, for all of his charming and unassuming manner.
Why is it your experience that most women want other, superfluous things? Because the world is replete with shallow, hollow, stupid people….Half of whom happen to be women. That’s why, when you find a person of true substance you have to pounce immediately (which, since you’re married I assume you did) or it might pass you by.
Edited to add: I hope that next poster doesn't say that cute butts are the most important thing, or I might get a strike for being inflammatory with that last paragraph!