QUOTE(GoAmerica @ Nov 19 2003, 08:14 PM)
QUOTE(amf @ Nov 19 2003, 01:04 PM)
And, to continue with dumb economic policy laced with North Carolina politics, Bush wants to limit clothing imports from China.
Dumb. Dumb. Dumb.
It may seem dumb to you, but not to American workers who's factory jobs are going to China for cheaper costs.
It isn't quite that simple, though, is it, since many of the jobs being "exported" are for goods sold in America by American coprorations. For instance, Nike are notorious for their exploitation of third world workers, and many of Wal-Mart's cheap consumer goods are only that cheap because they are now sourced from countries like China.
It isn't a straightforward exchange of jobs, therefore, since stockholders in the American companies in question can do rather well out of the issue, as do American consumers who can buy goods at lower prices than they otherwise could, which in turn keeps inflation down and helps keep the wider economy under control.
From this perspective, maybe the Chinese shouldn't be the ones whose trade is constrained, but the companies that are so willing to sack American workers for the sake of a few cents on their share price.
On steel, I have a hunch that there will be some movement on this side of the poond (in which direction, I'm not sure) at the forthcoming EU summit, especially in the light of the recent presidential meetings Tony Blair has held with both France and the USA.