Very, very interesting....
If Hitler had not stalled during Operation Barbarossa (the invasion of Russia) I firmly believe that we all may be speaking German today...
The problem was that Hitler did not trust Stalin (who would?). He hated communists worse than anyone (and that says alot).
The invasion of Russia itself was not what lost Hitler the war. The failed invasion did. If Hitler could have taken Moscow prior to the Winter of 1941, then he would have had a decent chance at eliminating the "two front" scenario that ulitimately lost him the war.
[URL=When did Hitler lose the war ?]When did Hitler lose the war ?[/URL]
QUOTE
It's obvious that Hitler gambled everything by invading Russia, that attacking Russia and failing to defeat it could only mean that Germany will be defeated.
When the German invasion of Russia began in June 1941, Germany could potentially defeat Russia and win the war. Its initial victories were tremendous. Russian losses in men, equipment, and land, were unbelievably enormous. But Russia is HUGE, with endless resources, its soldiers are tough, and its winter is terrible for anyone not fully equipped for it, and the German military was definitely NOT equipped for the russian winter, and knew it.
So about a month after the victorious invasion began, Hitler and the German high command began to realize that they are simply advancing too slow in their race to defeat Russia before winter, which their grossly over-confident war plan considered a major condition, with no alternative.
The German conclusion in the beginning of September 1941 was that now they must concentrate everything in an all-or-nothing effort to take Moscow before winter. This effort was also initially successful. In October 2nd 1941 Hitler declared the final assault on Moscow. In the 2nd week of October, there was a confident public German announcement that the outcome of the war has been decided and Russia is defeated.
QUOTE
We can ask if Germany lost the war even earlier, for example when it failed to defeat Great Britain with airplanes and submarines, leaving it as an essential future base for massive US forces and a second front. Or when it just began its invasion of Russia. The answer to that is negative. As long as he wasn't at war with Russia, Hitler had options and possibilities, nothing was final yet. When he invaded Russia, he could still do things differently, such as concentrating the effort on Moscow from the beginning, and presenting the war as campaign of liberation from Stalin's brutal regime in order to soften russia's resistance, but Hitler interfered with the military conduct of the invasion from the beginning, and the unprecedented nazi brutality that aimed to decimate and enslave them, left the tough russian people with no other choice but to fight their toughest war, and utilize their endless resources much better than ever, and by doing so Hitler lost his last remaining options and his chance of winning the war.
So in December of 1941, at the gates of Moscow, Hitler's war was lost. It took 3 1/2 more years to end, thanks to the outstanding fighting skill and loyalty of the german soldier, but he could no longer win it.
The German army was the pinnacle of its time. That was not enough for it to win the war, however.
That was scenario #2.
As for Scenario #1:
QUOTE
1)Hitler would have defeated England and Europe and struck a cease fire with the US and Russia
Tough to say....Hitler was a megalomaniac and probably would have made a deal with one side to backstab the other. Then, when the one side (presumably the Russians) were taken out, he would turn on his "allies".
Scenario #3 may be the most interesting...The US was in a period of isolationism. The war in Europe was not a great concern. The economy was recovering (slowly) from the Great Depression. Would we have gotten into a war a mere 23 years after we lost 125,000 troops with over a quarter million wounded? Would we have mobilized with enough speed to stop the Japanese advance in the Pacific or help Europe at D-Day? I doubt it.