Fubar--It has always been my contention that this faith that you say some or most religious people have ought to be either adequately defined or these people haven't the slightest clue as to what they are talking or behaving about. It is especially true of christians and jews, mainly because of their economic situation, that they have very little if any faith in the notion of a ghost controling even a small portion of their material or "spiritual" (read "that which causes inspiration") life. Faith by definition and as a practice means trust, predictability, and assurance that whatever one has "faith in" will be responsible for requests (prayers and supplications) being answered. I know of no-one who has a faith in a ghost other than their verbal declarations and financial donations that they can easily afford (mainly for reasons of guilt, show, tax purposes or this-is-what-you're-supposed-to-do as they drop their coins in the collection plate). Besides, as M Twain points out very clearly, they're are few to none who are interested in spending more than one hour a week in in observance of their "faith". Just think how they'll react when they are in church permanently after they kick the bucket. They can't even stand it for more than one hour out of 280.
If you still have faith in this ghost try comparing your faith in the ghost to your faith in your dentist, doctor, or your lawyer.
P.S. Does anyone have any idea just how often this so-called president practices going to church? After all he DOES say that j.c. is the only hero in his life.
Religionists are so chicken**** when it comes to demonstrating their "faith". 10 percent...a lousy ten percent of their income devoted to the maker of all things including their life and the rest devoted to "material" investments. Ha! What chicken**** these people are! They are such fakes it's laughable.