I think the main point that should be addressed here is that substance abuse is a problem, period. I could cite as many stories decrying drug abuse among blacks or among hispanics or among those below the poverty line or among urban youth, regardless of sexual orientation. I don't personally feel that it is an issue which should be compartmentalized on the basis of minority status.
What this
does indicate to me is that, among minorities, there seems to be greater concern about substance abuse within those communities than there may be in our society at large. Whether there's anything to the whole "higher prevalence of alcohol and drug use in the [fill in the blank] community" is another story.
I have heard this "disproportionate problem" claim about the gay community before, of course - and have read research which makes the same claim regarding
ethnic minorities - but I have yet to see any compelling evidence, especially in relation to gays. Surely
every minority can't have a "disproportionate" problem or they would soon be the majority. Or are we simply saying that straight, white, rural folk over sixty have a disproportionately
lower problem with drug abuse?
Of the six sources cited by
Amlord, for example, half of them make the claim that substance abuse is a greater problem among the gay community than within the rest of society - and none seem conclusive. The rest simply state that the gay community is aware of the fact that drug abuse exists.
One of the sites I can't get to download for some reason (the soberdykes.org one - which seems to be addressing alcoholism among lesbians). Of the remaining two which actually seem to promote the "disproportional" issue, one cites no corroborative sources at all, merely stating that "studies have suggested". Which studies those might be is never actually mentioned. (And that article is focussing
exclusively on "party drugs" - not IV drugs, for example.)
The other source cites "research
claiming higher levels of drug misuse amongst lesbians, gay men and bisexuals"
as well as "research
questioning higher levels of drug misuse amongst some sections of the LGB community". The ones which seem to support this claim are, themselves, problematic. One, for example, states that it was conducted among "homosexual men under stress". I would imagine that substance abuse might be slightly higher among
any given group of people "under stress".
The first problem is that remaining studies which "suggest" a greater prevalence of drug use within the gay community (at least those which make reference to their sampling techniques at all) are based on studies among "urban gay men" or "the queer community" (which suggests, to me, the more ghettoized urban centers) or "young people". Were any of these samples weighted against the gay population as a whole? None of them seem to take into account gay men who may lead quieter lives - who may be in long-term relationships, who may be older, who may be rural or sub-urban - who may
not be "on the scene". I don't think anyone would dispute that drug use is rampant in club culture. But are we comparing circuit party denizens to everyone else?
The second problem has to do with the sampling itself. How were these samples gathered? Case studies in one report were admittedly taken from gay
health clinics - where people go for
drug treatment. Duh. Were the rest random samples from anonymous telephone interviews where people were asked by a stranger what their sexual preference was? Were they questionnaires in gay publications, many of which double as club guides? Were they
all taken from health clinics?? None of them say
which method was used to skew the data.
The third problem is that, in such a sample, all participants were willing to admit, in some form, that they were gay. I suspect that those who are willing to be forthcoming about their sexual preference are more likely to be forthcoming about their drug use as well. At the very best, such studies can only possibly determine any statistics on the basis of the unabashedly "out" population.
Finally, what kind of drugs are we talking about here? "Party drugs" seem to be the most frequently discussed at all of these sites. Some of the studies are looking at alcohol only. What would the stats look like if we
excluded amyl nitrate (a legal, non-addictive "drug" used for treating angina, whose effects last less than sixty seconds) and
included heroin or crack?
I think the most that can safely be assumed on the basis of these studies is that openly gay young men "on the scene" are more likely to abuse party drugs than the population as a whole. Well, sure. I have no doubt that some circuit boy in San Francisco is more likely to take a hit of poppers at a rave than some housewife in Oklahoma is to have a crank habit. But to try to extrapolate from what can only ever be a narrow, incomplete, and misrepresentative sample the behavior of a global population is simply bad research.
I can see where some well-intended gay organizations might wish to make use of a bit of scare-mongering in order to heighten awareness of a problem. The drawback is that anti-gay groups can use similar scare-mongering to fan the flames of homophobia - as we have seen done elsewhere in these threads.
To answer the question posed -
Is drug use a huge problem in the gay community? - yes, of course it is. Drug use - or, more properly, abuse - is a huge problem in
every community. And the gay community is the world in microcosm. I am glad to see that gay groups are taking a proactive approach in relation to their own members - as are black groups - as are hispanic groups - as are many advocacy groups. But I'm
not convinced that it is a huger problem among any of these communities than it is in our society as a whole.
Would we were
all taking such a proactive approach to substance abuse rather than throwing millions of dollars per annum at the counter-productive "War on Drugs" and wasting even more on advertising campaigns full of transparent misinformation. Substance abuse is
everybody's problem. It's time we got real about it.