QUOTE(Mrs. Pigpen @ Oct 10 2003, 08:33 AM)
Your gold/dinar link didn't work, but I don't know how it's relevant since neither the US nor the EU uses the gold standard for their currencies.
My apologies for putting a , where a . should be.
I am afraid it is very relevant and for that reason will post it again.
http://www.dawn.com/2003/04/21/ebr5.htmThe dinar constitutes a fairly big slab of the World economic powerhouse and their wish to move away from the US dollar into a gold based trading commodity may have serious implications on the US economy.
How many offshore US companies are within the dinar zone?
QUOTE(Mrs. Pigpen @ Oct 10 2003, 08:33 AM)
Yes, our debt is bad. I'm betting Europe's debt is bad, too. The question is, as a percentage of GDP, which is worse?
I am afraid I cannot give you the current Euro GDP but I also assume it's not so good.
The pre-occupation with GDP's is a little misleading, a focus on the on-going foreign debt increase is more relevant where the US's has been increasing for the last few years and the Europeans managed to control theirs.
It is this lack of control in debt spending and the American absolute belief in themselves that has created this situation.
I can only put this down to a difference in philosophic outlook between Americans and Europeans regarding saving and borrowing.
QUOTE(Mrs. Pigpen @ Oct !0 2003, 08:33 AM)
You are perfectly willing (throughout numerous posts on this forum) to ascertain that the US is morally bankrupt because they give less than other countries towards humanitarian aid. In fact, we give more in humanitarian aid than any country in the world. The only way you could say we fall short in the comparison is by percentage of GDP or contribution per person.
I don't think I ever actually said that the US was morally bankrupt, but now you mention it
You certainly do give more in aid as a nation, but much less as individuals, I thought I made that clear as well, and posted comparisons.
I think Denmark came into it somewhere.
QUOTE(Mrs. Pigpen @ Oct 10 2003, 08:33 AM)
You cannot maintain an honest argument and change your standard everytime it suits your purpose. Either we're the most generous country in the world deeply in debt, or we're quite ungenerous but our debt isn't so enormous compared to much of Europe.
Mrs.P
The first sentence of this is really most unlike you and untrue.
Because my honest arguments are not your honest arguments makes mine wrong?
I have never seen yours as wrong...just patriotic American.
Please explain if I have changed my standards, and when.
QUOTE(Mrs. Pigpen @ Oct 10 2003, 08:33 AM)
Yes, absorbing crippled economies is bad for a currency. There are reasons for this and "it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out". Hint: Anyone can be a Turkish millionare.
No not at all.
The EU has certain criteria laid down before membership ( I may have already mentioned this) and this has to be met before joining. The American ally, Turkey, has a problem with the EU concerning human rights and I would suggest you either look in 'Amnesty International' or 'Outstanding UN resolutions' to discover why.
Another of these criteria is to have a foreign debt below a certain level.
Take care...........
Regards...Alan