One liners are fine, but it ignores the important point Pheeler is making. Anyways, here is an OLD link, since Conservpat doesn't feel like sharing. (I'll discuss why after a few excerpts.)
Pentagon Joins French Boycott This article is actually from a few weeks after the original story
ALL THE WAY BACK IN EARLY APRIL. Some excerpts for your amusement.
QUOTE
The Aussie soldiers also discovered a cache of Roland 2 missiles and a launcher near the hidden MiG jets.
Roland 2 Missles are dated back to the mid-80's and are used throughout NATO. Even
if they were acquired before U.N. sanctions came into effect, and even
if they were acquired after the Gulf War, it would have been easy to obtain them from other sources than the manufacturer which would have no incentive to sell obsolete equipment to such an unpopular client.
QUOTE
In addition, U.S. airborne troops from the 101st division recently stumbled onto a French-made Roland 3 missile system, complete with radar, computer and fire control electronics. The French army first deployed the Roland 3 advanced missile in 1995. The Roland 3 unit supplied to Iraq would be a clear violation of the U.N. arms embargo placed on Iraq after the first Gulf War.
Here's where Conservpat could perhaps hang his argument. However, the article immediately says:
QUOTE
French defense ministry officials recently denied that the Roland 3 was supplied to Iraq. However, French defense industry insiders speculated that Iraq might have acquired the Roland 3 unit illegally from "mafia" sources, suggesting that Paris has a problem with black market theft inside advanced military projects.
Now "Industry Insiders" aren't always the best of sources, the fact that the extremely anti-French article even prints it, and that nothing has become of the story in the ten months... Yes, TEN MONTHS since it broke would seem to make it pretty clear that the French government has little involvement in Iraq posessing ONE SINGLE MISSLE SYSTEM.