QUOTE(pheeler @ Nov 11 2003, 11:02 PM)
As I read it , slashdot, the panhandlers who were given settlements had been wrongly arrested or ticketed. Anyone who is wrongly arrested is compensated.
QUOTE(suntimes.com)
As part of a tentative agreement in the class-action lawsuit
and i infer this to mean it was arbitrated (it was a settlement), but not mandated. Thusly, i have not been persuaded that they were wrongly arrested, even though the settlement conditions will be honored.
QUOTE(suntimes.com)
arrests were made under a panhandling ordinance on the books from 1991 to March 2002.
additionally, this may speak to a "raw deal", but not so much a miscarriage of justice. it
appears due process was respected.
my $.02 (canadian)