Jaime: You suggest that advocates of marijuana legalization would not recommend its use while "driving, working or doing other similar public functions" and, overall, I agree. However, while I wouldn't operate heavy machinery while stoned, I've always found that a joint or two are extremely useful tools for creative work. As a designer, I found cannabis to be almost essential when working on roughs and renderings - and, as a director, very helpful when working on script analyis and blocking. I also find marijuana fairly condusive to writing - though it doesn't always do wonders for one's tpying siklls.
Juber: You actually have a health book that says marijuana "lowers you brain pattern"?
"Lowers your brain pattern"?? In what decade was this health book published? Sounds like something out of a fifties sci-fi movie. In your illustration, incidentally, it appears that marijuana
raises your "brain pattern" - whatever the heck that is.
By the way, any time
I've been "HIGH", getting into a fight with cops has been the
last thing I'd be interested in pursuing.
Juber/Kim: Given that the CIA has frequently profited from illegal drug trafficking and is also responsible for acts of terror, I guess drugs
do fund terrorism.
Cyan/Kim: One of the problems with anti-drug propaganda, be it "Reefer Madness" or D.A.R.E. pamphlets, is that the misinformation is so easily disproved. When kids realize that they've been mislead about cannabis, they could assume that they've been similarly mislead about cocaine or methamphetamines or heroin (which, to an extent, they probably have been) and could be more prone to "experiment" with harder drugs, imagining them to be as harmeless as a few joints. The only positive effect is that it could also lead them to question the authority of parents, teachers, the police, and civic leaders on other issues. Then again, what good is a bit of independent thought if one is strung out on crack?