Questions to debate:
Question # 1. Should the laws be written so that it is legal for someone to produce a first person shooter "game" in which the targets in the game look like real people who currently hold public office?

Question #2. Should the laws be written so that it is legal for someone to produce a first person shooter "game" in which the targets in the game look like real people who do not currently hold public office?

Question #3. If the answer to question #1 is a no and the answer to question #2 is a yes, why should the laws be written so it's ok to only produce "games" that advocate violence against people who don't public office but it's not ok to produce games against people who do hold public office? In other words, why should people who don't hold public office receive no legal protection while those who are in public office do get legal protection?

<div><table width='50%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' style='border: 1px solid black' align='center'><tr><td class='maintitle'> Topic closed...</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Reason: Duplicate topic.<br /><br />Recommended action: Please use the search feature to locate a similar topic. If you are unable to find a similar topic, please contact the staff member who closed the topic by clicking the PM button below this post.<br /><br />Helpful links:<br /> - Simple Search<br /> - Advanced Search<br /> - Starting New Topics<br /> - Survival Guide<br /> - The Rules<br /> - Staff Directory<br /></td></tr><tr><td class='darkrow1'><div align='center'>Note: This is an automated response.</div></td></tr></table></div>

Try this: What does everyone think of less than lethal, weapons used by video game characters?
or
Violent Video Games