I really take offense from you american in yrs when you make a blanket statement that says since we are against illegal aliens entering the US we are racist, when all we want is the laws to be enforced and not tossed aside. I have quite abit of information for you so hold on here it comes.
CLINTON DEMANDS MASSIVE NEW AMNESTYQUOTE
Everybody knows that rewarding illegal aliens in this way would be unlikely to pass if exposed to public hearings and public floor debates. But these amnesties always are slipped through in the dead of night in a cowardly fashion. No committees consider the consequences of constantly rewarding illegal aliens. No hearings explore how many millions more illegal aliens are enticed by these constant rewards.
And I liked and voted for Clinton but disagree with this.
The amnesty mistake QUOTE
Every guest-worker program in history has failed,” says Mark Krikorian of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Immigration Studies. “It always results in permanent immigration.” This one would be no different.
QUOTE
An amnesty will inevitably present a security problem. The U.S. immigration system is already overwhelmed. Putting aside the reliability of Mexican documentation, who is going to do the background checks on hundreds of thousands of new immigrants coming here? During the last amnesty in 1986, there were thousands upon thousands of cases of fraud. One plotter in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing gained amnesty under the 1986 law as a farm worker. “There is no way that a new amnesty program won’t give green cards to terrorists,” says Krikorian. “I can guarantee it.”
Promise Unfulfilled Why Didn’t Collective Bargaining Transform California’s Farm Labor Market?QUOTE
California has the most pro-worker and pro-union labor relations law in the United States, and Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers (UFW) were expected to use it to transform farm work from a job to a career. Instead, unauthorized immigration increased the supply of workers, and farm labor contractors organized them into crews that unions found hard to organize. Instead of giving unions a second wind, legalization in 1986 accelerated the vicious spiral of more workers, more labor contractors, and declining farm wages and benefits, encouraging workers with other U.S. job options to find nonfarm jobs. The revolving door that introduces rural Mexicans to the U.S. labor market turned ever faster in the 1980s and 1990s, and the unionized share of the workforce fell while the unauthorized share rose.
Bush plan for illegals out of touch with realityQUOTE
Administrative capacity: The White House does not appear to realize that the federal government simply doesn't have the ability to manage such a program. In the past, when immigration authorities lacked needed personnel and other resources, the result of such overload was massive fraud.
One consequence was the issuance of a green card to Mahmud Abouhalima in the 1986 illegal-alien amnesty; once he had legal status, he was able to travel to Afghanistan to get terrorist training, which he used to lead the first World Trade Center bombing.
snipet
No provision for enforcing the new rules: The reason we're in this mess is that immigration laws have not been enforced in the past, and any effort to fix things has to address how new rules are going to be enforced.
snipet
And only 13 - thirteen - companies were fined for hiring illegals in 2002.
snipet
No limits on numbers or wages: The small guest worker programs in current law have various controls to try to ensure they don't do more harm than good. The new White House plan, on the other hand, would permit any employer in any industry to import any number of workers and pay them any wage above the legal minimum. This is so radical, and so potentially devastating to the middle class, that it is clear no one even thought through the implications.
snipet
Workers won't go home: It's been said "there's nothing as permanent as a temporary worker." Every guest worker program in human history has created large-scale permanent immigration, but the White House seems unaware of this fact.
Immigration, Saudi StyleQUOTE
What's more, labor-market tests that serve to limit current guestworker categories would be discarded, in favor of a "clear and efficient" system, in the president's words, that would enable employers "to find workers quickly and simply." I specifically asked a senior White House official whether the current job protections would be used — such as a labor-market test or a requirement that the employer offer the "prevailing wage" for that occupation — and was told that such mechanisms were too bureaucratic and would not be used. What would likely result would be an Internet job registry, permitting employers to offer jobs at any wage above the legal minimum, and when no Americans or legal immigrants applied after a specified number of days, they would be permitted to import foreigners. Without any statutory or administrative limits, this flow of new workers would quickly number in the millions.
Border Patrol's union opposes amnesty QUOTE
The U.S. Border Patrol's union has spoken out against President Bush's immigration proposal, calling it a "slap in the face" to federal agents who risk their lives to keep illegal border crossers out of the country and rewarding those the agency fails to catch.
snipet
T.J. Bonner, the union leader, said that, if passed, the new law would jeopardize border security by ushering a massive onslaught of illegal crossers attracted by the prospect of easy access to jobs.
"It's demoralizing to be out there every day risking your life and then they come out with this thing," Bonner said. "All the times you've been assaulted, shot at - it doesn't mean anything."
CostsQUOTE
Even though illegal aliens make little use of welfare, from which they are generally barred, the costs of illegal immigration in terms of government expenditures for education, criminal justice, and emergency medical care are significant. California has estimated that the net cost to the state of providing government services to illegal immigrants approached $3 billion during a single fiscal year. The fact that states must bear the cost of federal failure turns illegal immigration, in effect, into one of the largest unfunded federal mandates.
GuestworkersQUOTE
The H-1B visa program was invented in 1990 because of congressional panic over a forecasted labor shortage which never materialized. The program allowed for 65,000 temporary visas, good for up to six years, for people in "specialty occupations" tied to a specific employer. The main payoff of an H-1B visa is sponsorship by one's employer for a green card, and indeed the program, which government audits have identified as rife with abuse, has become a backdoor toward permanent immigration.
Jobs Americans Won't Do Voodoo Economics from the White HouseQUOTE
Even many opponents of the proposed Bush Amnesty assume this to be true, leading them to propose new and improved guestworker programs, with provisions for stricter controls against permanent settlement, greater incentives to return, tighter enforcement against unscrupulous employers, etc.
As well-meaning as such efforts may be, the basic assumption is false — there is simply no economic reason to import foreign workers.
snipet
If the supply of foreign workers were to dry up (say, through actually enforcing the immigration law, for starters), employers would respond to this new, tighter, labor market in two ways. One, they would offer higher wages, increased benefits, and improved working conditions, so as to recruit and retain people from the remaining pool of workers. At the same time, the same employers would look for ways to eliminate some of the jobs they now are having trouble filling. The result would be a new equilibrium, with blue-collar workers making somewhat better money, but each one of those workers being more productive.
Many people fear the first part of such a response, claiming that prices for fruits and vegetables would skyrocket, fueling inflation. But since all unskilled labor — from Americans and foreigners, in all industries — accounts for such a small part of our economy, perhaps four percent of GDP, we can tighten the labor market without any fear of sparking meaningful inflation. Agricultural economist Philip Martin has pointed out that labor accounts for only about ten percent of the retail price of a head of lettuce, for instance, so even doubling the wages of pickers would have little noticeable effect on consumers.
But it's the second part of the response to a tighter labor market that people just don't get. By holding down natural wage growth in labor-intensive industries, immigration serves as a subsidy for low-wage, low-productivity ways of doing business, retarding technological progress and productivity growth.
snipet
As it is for copper or oil, this fact is true also for labor; as wages have risen over time, innovators have devised ways of substituting capital for labor, increasing productivity to the benefit of all. The converse, of course, is also true; the artificial superabundance of a resource will tend to remove much of the incentive for innovation.
Stagnating innovation caused by excessive immigration is perhaps most apparent in the most immigrant-dependent activity — the harvest of fresh fruit and vegetables. The period from 1960 to 1975 (roughly from the end of the "Bracero" program, which imported Mexican farmworkers, to the beginning of the mass illegal immigration we are still experiencing today) was a period of considerable agricultural mechanization. But a continuing increase in the acreage and number of crops harvested mechanically did not materialize as expected, in large part because the supply of workers remained artificially large due to the growing illegal immigration we were politically unwilling to stop.
I have shown many reasons why supporting illegal immigration is in fact not helping us but will only hurt us. If you want I can give even more reasons.