QUOTE(Julian)
The wars on drugs or terrorism aren't going to cut the funding to groups like al-Quaeda. Read your commercial history books - if you want to do that, the best way is to legalise them. How long would it be before hard-pressed US or European farmers in suitable areas (say, New Mexico, Texas, Spain, etc) started growing opium poppies, or Caribbean plantations struggling with banana quotas would plant lots of coca?
Sure, there's an occasional horror story from the front line of our "war" on drugs. That is to be expected so long as we keep refusing to deal with addiction as a disease rather than as a crime. But, these stories would pale in comparison to the horrors that would be unleashed if we were to legalize the free trade of hardcore narcotics. It would be as bad as legalizing the free trade of smallpox.
QUOTE(Julian)
Fighting the war on drugs by using guns on their home ground seems a little silly to me, when we know from history that if we just unleash the forces of global capitalism against them, a war which the West has never managed to lose, we'd put them out of the global terror business within a year.
The west may dominate the world economy but we are far from undefeated. We have lost a lot to overseas competition. So, rather than unleashing capitalism against the drug lords, we'd be unleashing them into global capitalism. Since they already dominate the underground markets, they would be the first ones in line to dominate the commercial markets. If we spent a fraction of what we spend funding corrupt foreign armies on drug rehab programs here, they would loose a lot of power and maybe we'd see some real political changes in those countries.
QUOTE(Julian)
Quite apart from the fact the Western governments could then start to tax the huge revenues of the drug trade, since it would then be part of the legitimate economy. Of course, it would create some health problems, but the commercial standardisation that would come with legality would also remove those caused by diluting cocaine with Drain-o.
If hardcore narcotics ever became a hugh part of our economy, quality control would be the very least of our concerns.
QUOTE(Julian)
It all just boils down to how badly do we want to win, and do we want to fight on our terms, or theirs?
Don't you get it? It's not a "win" or "loose" campaign. There will always be drugs in the world and there will always be people who are willing to take them- out of sheer curiosity if anything else. We should always make an effort to educate people about the dangers. But, above all else, drug production, distribution and abuse must remain illegal.
That said, all the bad drug laws that were created over the last twenty five or so years entirely for political gain need to be amended or abolished- especially possession. Possession should be reduced to a misdemeanor and anyone found with drugs should be subject to nothing more than search and seizure. No arrest, no bail and no jail unless they are clearly addicted and/or under the influence.