QUOTE
Unabomber
oh, and what really happened dot com put up links to the pictures of the coffins (WRH.com is a collection of links to newsites around the globe) back in mid april (come to think of it I don't ever recall seeing those photos on CNN)
You're right. You know why? Cause CNN thought it would be more appropriate to show a list with
an actual photo of the deceased! Also included is their hometown, unit, and when, where and how they died. Here's the link.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/ What do you think is more appropriate? A coffin or an actual face. Coffins can (and if they haven't already will) be used in a negative light. You can't do that with a face. A person.
QUOTE
Unabomber
Unfortunately, I think this is again a case where the writer has had no immersion in the very least with the military. Apparently, he knows more than Tillman's family, his friends, his comrades in arms, and the US Govt, because they all think he was a hero. I mean, he didn't get the Silver Star because he did something ordinary. He got it because he gave his life to save his fellow soldiers from an ambush. All those people I mentioned think he's a hero. I think he's a hero. And if one can't grasp the idealism of selflessness, then I guess one would be so inclined to call Tillman an 'idiot'.
...so just because someone has never served in the military means their opinion on war is invalid? well, rush should shut his mouth as should micheal savage and sean hannity. now, don't get me wrong, tillman may have acted heroicly, but we should also remember that "truth is the first casuality of war". also, remember what was said of private lynch? they said she fought back against the Iraqis, and fired her m-16 until she ran out of ammo. turned out to be a propagandic lie. oh, yeah, the US govt also thought lynch was a hero. just because THEY think tillman's a hero, doesn't mean he is (not in the sense they mean it)
First off, I made that quote, not Aquilla. He doesn't need to be associated with a scoundrel like me!
And if you ask me, I will take the word and advice of a 55 year old Vietnam Vet who I live nextdoor to over some pretentious punk with an attitude and a pen at UMass. I respect
all military historians, many of which but not all, have served. But I will always look to those who have first hand experience before anyone else. For instance, when I asked
DTOM about Field Manual references, it's not cause I think he's a swell guy (though I have huge respect for Airborne Rangers!) It's cause, guess what. He's been there. He knows. It's a little arrogant for someone who's never served to decide who's a hero and who is not.
But this quote stuck out
U...
QUOTE
now, don't get me wrong, tillman may have acted heroicly...
But acting heroically doesn't warrant being called a hero? Does heroically have a different definition then the one I remember? And correct me if I'm wrong, but just because not all soldiers get media attention, doesn't mean that no one thinks that they aren't heroes. I have a friend who was in Military Intelligence in Iraq with V Corps. She made it back. To me, she's a hero in a way. She served her country when others wouldn't.
Pat Tillman died protecting his troops. He didn't make it back. He's a hero in a way too. Especially in the 'sense they mean'. As I said, they don't hand out Silver Stars for nothing.
As for what
DTOM said, I 100% agree. I'm not interested in seeing fellow soldiers and the families of the fallen weep. I'm not interested in having a televised funeral in between commercials for
Coke and
Viagra. When a loved one, a soldier, is laid to rest, it is a private moment. It should stay as such. I'd rather take my small American flag I have boxed up somewhere, hang it up, and say a prayer of thanks for all those who have fallen, then to watch a funeral service during dinner.
Which leads me to sort of a tangent, bare with me for a minute. What is gained by seeing a televised funeral? Do you think that the American psyche is so detached from the consequences of war that we need to be educated day after day? What will we benefit by watching weeping loved ones of a fallen service member? I can tell you. NOTHING. Personally, I think that people who push for such things, as well as the Dover photos, have ulterior agendas they want to push. I can't remember (it might of been Robert E. Lee) who said it was good that war was as horrific as it was so we may not grow fond of it. That's true, but to push anti-war agendas while claiming they only want the soldiers to be honored is crap. Straight up crap.
Funny, no body ever thought to ask the soldiers, any soldier, if their casket, if their funeral could be televised or photographed. I wonder why?
I could imagine anyone, I know I do, who sees the pics of the caskets doesnt think of the names, the faces, the personas behind those wooden frames. At least not at first. They think, wow, those are a lot of caskets. And that's what the anti-war folks are pushing...
DEATH EQUALS CASKETS
CASKETS EQUAL NUMBERS
NUMBERS ARE BAD
...not the fact that lying in each of those caskets are men and women who served with high honor and paid the ultimate price. Sorry for the tangent, but I needed to address
Unabomber's remarks on 'honoring' all of our fallen troops during sweeps on FOX.