QUOTE(Federal Food Drug And Cosmetic Act)
There is established in the Department of Health and Human Services the Food and Drug Administration (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ``Administration'').
( B ) Mission
The Administration shall--
( 1 ) promote the public health by promptly and efficiently
reviewing clinical research and taking appropriate action on the
marketing of regulated products in a timely manner;
( 2 ) with respect to such products, protect the public health by
ensuring that--
( A ) foods are safe, wholesome, sanitary, and properly
labeled;
( B ) human and veterinary drugs are safe and effective;
( C ) there is reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of devices intended for human use;
( D ) cosmetics are safe and properly labeled; and
( E ) public health and safety are protected from electronic
product radiation;
Should the FDA have the power to regulate tobacco products?The wonder is why a product that is clearly a device to convey nicotine -- a known drug with addictive properties -- hasn't been allowed to be regulated before.
Tobacco has one purpose: It conveys the nicotine drug into the body. And since the early 1960's, we've known that this method of conveyance was toxic to both long-term users and those with certain diseases (asthma, for example). And in the past 20 years, we've also figured out the different toxic and carcinogenic properties that came along with the nicotine. Seems reasonable that an agency created specifically to regulate drugs should be allowed to regulate what goes into a cigarette.