Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Should the FDA Be Given Control Over Tobacco?
America's Debate > Archive > Assorted Issues Archive > [A] Science and Technology > [A] Health and Medicine
Google
Victoria Silverwolf
Here's an interesting news article:

Senate OKs $12B Tobacco Buyout, Regulation

QUOTE
The Senate approved a plan to give the government broad new powers to regulate the cigarette industry, including the ability to eliminate harmful ingredients in tobacco products and forbid advertising that appeals to children.

   The measure empowering the Food and Drug Administration to oversee the sale, marketing and manufacturing of cigarettes was linked on the Senate floor Thursday to a $12 billion buyout of tobacco farmers.

An unlikely coalition of anti-smoking advocates and tobacco-state senators pushed to secure the 78-15 vote to add the twin measures to a massive corporate tax bill that the Senate then passed on a voice vote and sent to a House-Senate conference committee.

The House-passed tax bill includes a plan to pay tobacco farmers to leave the federal tobacco-growing system but does not give FDA any new powers. Health groups hailed the Senate action.


I'll ask about the twelve billion dollar buyout on another thread. For now:

Should the FDA have the power to regulate tobacco products?
Google
amf
QUOTE(Federal Food Drug And Cosmetic Act)
There is established in the Department of Health and Human Services the Food and Drug Administration (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ``Administration'').

( B ) Mission

    The Administration shall--
        ( 1 ) promote the public health by promptly and efficiently
    reviewing clinical research and taking appropriate action on the
    marketing of regulated products in a timely manner;
        ( 2 ) with respect to such products, protect the public health by
    ensuring that--
            ( A ) foods are safe, wholesome, sanitary, and properly
        labeled;
            ( B ) human and veterinary drugs are safe and effective;
            ( C ) there is reasonable assurance of the safety and
        effectiveness of devices intended for human use;
            ( D ) cosmetics are safe and properly labeled; and
            ( E ) public health and safety are protected from electronic
        product radiation;


Should the FDA have the power to regulate tobacco products?

The wonder is why a product that is clearly a device to convey nicotine -- a known drug with addictive properties -- hasn't been allowed to be regulated before.

Tobacco has one purpose: It conveys the nicotine drug into the body. And since the early 1960's, we've known that this method of conveyance was toxic to both long-term users and those with certain diseases (asthma, for example). And in the past 20 years, we've also figured out the different toxic and carcinogenic properties that came along with the nicotine. Seems reasonable that an agency created specifically to regulate drugs should be allowed to regulate what goes into a cigarette.
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.