The issue of presidential nominations to federal court posts has come up again this month as President Bush is once again referring to blocked judicial nominees on the campaign/fundraising trail. The fact that Senator Edwards is a member of the Judiciary Committee further politicizes this issue.
The question for debate is:
Which statement is more accurate and why?
1) The democratic members of the Senate have unfairly manipulated the rules of the Senate to obstruct the confirmation process of President Bush's judicial appointees.
2) The democratic members of the Senate have had a solid record of confirming President Bush's appointees especially compared to the confirmation rate during other recent administrations.Links that flesh out this debate.
Partisanship Is Their PrincipleQUOTE
Plainly, these lawmakers are not interested in an even-handed application of the rules. They are merely manipulating the verbiage of principle to partisan advantage. Such unprecedented shenanigans politicize the judiciary — contrary to the very purpose of life appointments, which is to insulate federal judges from politics. Americans shouldn't tolerate this hypocrisy.
Setting The Record Straight On Judicial NominationsQUOTE
With these confirmations, there are only 26 vacant seats in the entire federal judiciary, which is the lowest level since the Reagan Administration. Senate Republicans more than doubled circuit court vacancies and raised overall federal court vacancies to more than 100 from 1995 through early 2001. Vacancies have been greatly reduced with Democratic cooperation during the last four years. Vacancies have been cut by more than 75 percent and judicial emergency vacancies have been cut by more than 60 percent from what they were.
Fact Sheet: Judicial Nominees QUOTE
A Senate minority composed of Democrats is obstructing the judicial confirmation process by waging unprecedented filibusters against some of the President's most important nominees -- those to the Federal courts of appeals. Six of the President's appeals court nominees who have been favorably reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee have been denied up-or-down votes. Each has enjoyed the support of a bipartisan majority of Senators and would be confirmed if given a vote.
Home-State Democratic Senators have also succeeded in delaying confirmation hearings on judicial nominees. In this Presidency, more appeals court nominees have had to wait over a year for a confirmation hearing than in the last 50 years combined.