QUOTE(Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace by Gore Vidal)
This is from a pre-Osama text: "Restrictions onpersonal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinions, including freedom of the press; the right to assembly and associations; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders of for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed." The tone is familiar. Clinton? Bush? Ashcroft? No. It is from Hitler's 1933 speech calling for "an Enabling Act" for "the protection of the People and the State" after the catastrophic Teichstag fir that the Nazis had secretly lit.
The phrasing for this "Enabling Act" and the provisions for it's use are eerily if not practically identical to that of the "Patriot Act." The intended use for the "Enabling Act" was similar to the Patriot Act as well (to usurp the Peoples rights in order to root out 'enemies of the state'). First question,
1)
Are these two acts not comparable?2)
Do you think that this comparison would affect proponents of the 'Patriot' Act's view?3)
Is the United States Government really more justified in their removal of citizen's rights than any other government? (even if our rhetoric sounds better)
*Edited to fix some ugly stuff