Funny, I posted this subject on Saturday-no one was interested. I'm gonna get a complex
QUOTE
The trouble began when Schwarzenegger signed off on a deal that would cut revenue to cities and counties for the next two years in exchange for constitutional protection against future reductions. Problem was that the governor promised legislators' support for the initiative without having consulted them first. When he reportedly reneged on parts of the deal in subsequent talks with Democrats, Schwarzenegger was roundly criticized by local officials. In response, the governor made a public appearance over the Fourth of July weekend, lashing out at Democrats. He appeared to be flailing and, for the first time, seemed politically vulnerable.
LA Times Some of the issues being fought over:
QUOTE
Local government: How and when legislators could tap local revenue in future state fiscal crises. Local officials have agreed to give up $2.6 billion for two years, but also have qualified a ballot initiative to prevent any losses without public vote if they don't get legislative agreement on alternative future protection.
Higher education: The state's four-year college administrators have agreed to cuts for two years and fee increases, but there apparently is no final agreement on size of fee increases and financial aid to offset them.
Aged, blind and disabled: When cost-of-living increases would kick in this year for state aid to this group.
Sue Your Boss: A law enacted last year makes it easier for workers to sue their bosses for violations of workplace rules.
School contracts: A two-year old law restricts the ability of school districts to hire private companies to drive buses, make repairs, prepare food and provide other services.
Other issues mentioned by lawmakers include a bond to cover the state's pension costs, fees for water and firefighting services, long-term debt, and other health and social programs.
Tulare RegisterThese are issues more substantive than "feng-shui" and voting age issues.
The remarks have sparked anger by his legislator opponents (naturally) and groups as diverse as the Senate's Natural Resources and Wildlife Committee, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Caucus and Feminist Majority. The remarks have been characterized as "third-grade insults", "sexist", "homophobic" and divisive.
The comments are interesting also because of Schwarzenegger's previously positive comments about the same people he is criticizing now that he isn't getting his way.