We've abused and killed animals for a host of pharmaceutical reasons. Viagra, for example, treats erectile dysfunction. A condition that can be temporarily caused by
other prescription drugs, and even lifestyle choices like
smoking, drinking, and drug use, although in the case of the latter, damage to blood vessels is probably permanent. And finally there are
alternative treatments for ED. Not that all of the above combined can stand in the way of a good investigation (and a chance to make a buck)!
QUOTE
Huntingdon Life Sciences is one of the world's largest product testing labs. Every year 180,000 animals, including dogs, cats, rats, mice, primates, rabbits, fish, birds and farm animals, are poisoned and killed testing agrochemcials, household products and pharmaceuticals like Viagra.
--
Last Chance for AnimalsQUOTE
But I’ve got a plan. Make vivisection duty mandatory for every human who supports animal testing. We are, after all, animals.
It will be just like jury duty. You get a note from the county advising you your turn has come, and you are to report next Tuesday. You call the evening before to see if the experiment has been cancelled. It hasn’t, but you learn they only want males. You are, so you show up the next day.
You learn you’ll be testing Viagra.
Good, you say.
I don’t need it (you hasten to add)
but what can it hurt?You soon find out. You take the drug. Instead of cutting off your penis, as happened in experiments on beagles, rabbits, rats, mice, and monkeys, the vivisectors (who at the very least have no testicles, else they would surely refuse each time they were told to torture another) cut open your penis and insert an electrode into a branch of the pelvic nerve. They pass a charge through for a minute at a time, causing erections. They then measure the blood pressure of the erection. Their hope is that Viagra will help maintain the erection.
It seems to do that, but you and everyone else concerned already knew that from many previous tests.
Can I go home now? you ask, your opened-penis smarting.
Oh, sorry, they say.
We forgot to tell you: afterwards all subjects are sacrificed.--
The Ecologist Should we allow people to mistreat and sometimes ultimately kill horses to treat post-menopausal women, an affliction that is a non-terminal illness?To alleviate human suffering? Sure thing. 'Course, if Lassie doesn't deserve that gruesome ending we can always look into stem cells...
I hear equine tastes good. Can anyone confirm?