Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: GOP claims liberals will ban the Bible
America's Debate > Archive > Election Forum Archive > [A] Election 2004
Pages: 1, 2
Google
yehoshua
QUOTE(Lesly)
You're presenting a could v. should scenario.


Yes, because that all this is. There are no facts that lead to the actual banning of the bible by Kerry. In fact there are no facts leading in the mailing to indicate that Kerry would ban the Bible. The words 'Kerry will ban the bible if elected' appear no where in the leaflet. It is inferred by a picture.

As BoF has mentioned, "a picture's worth a thousand words." And Silm has questioned about the picture, "What the heck else could this possibly be meant to convey?" Well here are some meanings:

1. 'Banned' was misspelled on the leaflets. They met 'band.' As in 'band together.'

2. Since the Bible is used in religiously wedding ceremony, and the picture appears along side a man proposing to another man, that means that the Bible will no longer be used in man and man marriages.

3. That is a picture of the NIV, so only the NIV will be banned, all other bibles will remain.

4. The Bible is a book of many different storys, from how to eat, to how to wage war, to how to stone people, maybe the ideals are banned.

Just a couple off the top of my head. Not nearly a thousand words yet. Infer what you want by a picture. It doesn't change the fact that this is mere speculation of the future.

But is that not what elections are about? What will this person running do for me over the next four years? Maybe to the Religious, Kerry will ban the bible. May to liberal college student, Bush will start drafting. Who knows, that is what elections are about. What will this person do for you in the future.

Oh and by the way the convertive Christian is not the same as a Republican, it is like saying Greenpeace is a Democrat organization.
Google
Paladin Elspeth
QUOTE(yehoshua @ Sep 25 2004, 03:12 PM)
QUOTE(Devils Advocate)
You are discussing two different ads, while this thread is dealing with the letter only.


I used the Radio Ad as the explanation as to why the leaflets were sent out. It ties into this thread on the simple fact that the ad, leaflets, and RNC own statements all point the statement 'liberals will ban the Bible'. This thread is whether or not that statement takes "politicking" too far.

I have agreed from the beginning of this thread, that these leaflets and radio ads are not the best tactic to win the election, but by no means does this take "politicking" too far.

Debating as to whether or not certain material should be admitted into the debate is pointless. Everything is relevant if you can draw a line connecting it.

QUOTE(Devils Advocate)
It's wrong because it makes a blanket statement that has no truth.


Very well let's examine the logic and reasons behind the leaflet and radio ads.

There is a line drawn in America today.

That is true. Republican vs. Democrat. Catholic vs. Catholic. Cop vs. Criminal.

On one side are the radicals trying to uproot our traditional values and our culture.

That is true. Both sides could agree that the other side is a bunch of "radicals trying to uproot [there] traditional values and [there] culture." However traditionally the value of marriage is between a man and a women. As pointed out, "just because something (ie. marriage) has been done a certain way for generations, does not make it correct." So that means that Republicans hold the value of marriage traditionally, and Democrats hold the traditional value of marriage as incorrect. The statement is true only for the Republicans to make claim against the Democrats.

Culture is hard to argue in America, because America is a melting pot of culture. (A topic I have debated with many on other threads.)

They're fighting to hijack the institution of marriage...

That is true, as above has mentioned.

...plotting to legalize partial birth abortion...

That is true. Most liberals did not vote for the Partial Birth Abortion Bill, and have set in motion to remove the bill.

...and working to take God out of the pledge of allegiance...

That is true. Look at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

...and force the worst of Hollywood on the rest of America.

That is true. Kerry said, while speaking to the Hollywood elite, that the "heart and soul of America" was them.

After taking a closer look, it is clear to see that these claims are not "ridiculous, far fetched, and untrue." But rather right on que with liberals and Kerry.

QUOTE
That is true.  Republican vs. Democrat.  Catholic vs. Catholic.  Cop vs. Criminal.
Why didn't you add the term "respectively"? That is what you are implying. So, am I the Criminal Catholic or the Cop Catholic? dry.gif That's the problem with looking at everything from an either/or standpoint: You miss most of humanity.

QUOTE
However traditionally the value of marriage is between a man and a women. As pointed out, "just because something (ie. marriage) has been done a certain way for generations, does not make it correct." So that means that Republicans hold the value of marriage traditionally, and Democrats hold the traditional value of marriage as incorrect. The statement is true only for the Republicans to make claim against the Democrats.

How many Republican-voting couples are living together or having sex outside of marriage? How many have said that the marriage contract is "just a piece of paper," and that it is unnecessary to stand before a minister to consecrate a union? Geez, that's not "Biblical," either. Do you think the GOP is going to reject votes from these same couples as a matter of priniciple? Or is it just homosexual unions that are being condemned here?

Might I add that there is a large group in the GOP that does not oppose partial birth abortions?

And there are atheists in the GOP who don't give a rat's fanny about "under God" in the pledge. Remember, people, the Pledge of Allegiance existed before that clause--was it pinko or atheistic then?

QUOTE
...and force the worst of Hollywood on the rest of America.

(It seems to me Kid Rock is pro-Bush, yet he desecrated the Flag at the SuperBowl game by wearing it and then throwing it off himself... whistling.gif )

That is an interesting turn of phrase, "force the worst of Hollywood" on the "rest" of America. (Thanks so much for including the Hollywood crowd among Americans!) But the last time I checked, watching television programs and movies was a voluntary action for Americans; no one is putting a gun to your head to watch this stuff. That these actors and actresses are so starved to be seen as the people they really are that they undertake some stupid stuff (e.g., Britney Spears, who supports Bush, by the way, and her strange little wedding escapades) is really out of bounds when it comes to political campaigns.

As far as Sean Penn, Jeaneane Garofalo, Barbra Streisand et al., they are demonstrating their right to free speech. And they do it with some dignity. Arnold Schwarzeneggar doesn't do that, does he? I figure he's about as "Hollywood" as they come.

I can point out Jeri Ryan's husband, a Republican, who was running ostensibly a campaign for moral values--you know, the GOP patter, until his wife exposed him for wanting her to misbehave at sex clubs...Republican values again.

Now tell me that what I have written above are lies. Does that mean that the GOP is hypocritical, too? You decide.

Damn it, we've got a war going on where over 1,000 of those whom everyone characterizes as our best and brightest have died and for what? A quagmire? And we have a President who says "Stay the course"????????

What about the real issues, people?

EITHER PRESIDENT BUSH SHOULD BE ELECTED ON HIS RECORD OR HE SHOULD NOT. If he is such a great President, why are his campaigners resorting to this kind of CRAP?

----------------------------------------
(And as an aside to the Rather thing, yes, the documents were fake. But prove to me
  • Bush did not actually know he received special treatment getting into the "Champagne Unit" of the Guard
  • Lieutenant Bush was not grounded from flying for misbehavior or neglecting his duty
  • Bush actually was serving in Alabama--that he didn't just visit the dentist there
  • Bush had several buddies he served with who will come forward and speak for him
  • Bush didn't miss his military physical because he was doing drugs (or booze)
  • The White House isn't hiding his records for a reason
Where are the lies?)
yehoshua
QUOTE(BoF)
From the pope on down Catholic clergy has condemned the death penalty.


That is misleading. The Church does not condemned the death penalty it "opposes the death penalty in nearly all cases." They are not the same thing.

And why does it say this? As follows "The Church's commitment to the value and dignity of human life leads us to oppose the use of the death penalty. We believe that a return to the use of the death penalty is further eroding respect for life in our society." Pretty much the same argument against abortion.

QUOTE(BoF)
Kerry has taken an anti-death penalty stance while Bush not only supports it in theory, but practically ran a conveyor belt to the Texas death house in Huntsville, Texas as governor of the state.


Very true. Which goes back to the begin of the thread were I said "What is forgotten is that liberals are for helping the poor, raising children, education, and other such 'social' programs that are ideals held in the bible."

QUOTE(BoF)
Then is Bush banning the bible through his pro capitol punishment stance or is Kerry’s position a ban by position because he opposes the death penalty?


Yes. That is why I said that this is not a good tactic for the RNC.

QUOTE(BoF)
Further, the Pope has taken a strong stance against the war in Iraq.


Well not truly a strong stance compared to his stance against Homosexual Marriages in Canada, Homosexual Priest in the US, Stem Cell Research, Abortion, Communism and many other things.

QUOTE(BoF)
I’d call that a draw, if anybody really cares. Well, obviously someone cares, but as I told a friend recently, "I don't let any church or cleric do my thinking."


That is you. Others will differ. That is what makes this world so great. Is that even though you or others may get some leaflet claiming that so and so may do this fear tactic to you and your family, you have the option to say, 'This is silly.'

You should include in your list of people who don't think for you politicians.
Mrs. Pigpen
Closed permanently after staff review. This thread is a mess, and there have been too many reports of potentially inflammatory commentary.
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.