QUOTE(yehoshua @ Sep 25 2004, 03:12 PM)
QUOTE(Devils Advocate)
You are discussing two different ads, while this thread is dealing with the letter only.
I used the Radio Ad as the explanation as to why the leaflets were sent out. It ties into this thread on the simple fact that the ad, leaflets, and RNC own statements all point the statement 'liberals will ban the Bible'. This thread is whether or not that statement takes "politicking" too far.
I have agreed from the beginning of this thread, that these leaflets and radio ads are not the best tactic to win the election, but by no means does this take "politicking" too far.
Debating as to whether or not certain material should be admitted into the debate is pointless. Everything is relevant if you can draw a line connecting it.
QUOTE(Devils Advocate)
It's wrong because it makes a blanket statement that has no truth.
Very well let's examine the logic and reasons behind the leaflet and radio ads.
There is a line drawn in America today.That is true. Republican vs. Democrat. Catholic vs. Catholic. Cop vs. Criminal.
On one side are the radicals trying to uproot our traditional values and our culture.That is true. Both sides could agree that the other side is a bunch of
"radicals trying to uproot [there] traditional values and [there] culture." However traditionally the value of marriage is between a man and a women. As pointed out,
"just because something (ie. marriage) has been done a certain way for generations, does not make it correct." So that means that Republicans hold the value of marriage traditionally, and Democrats hold the traditional value of marriage as incorrect. The statement is true only for the Republicans to make claim against the Democrats.
Culture is hard to argue in America, because America is a melting pot of culture. (A topic I have debated with many on other threads.)
They're fighting to hijack the institution of marriage...That is true, as above has mentioned.
...plotting to legalize partial birth abortion...That is true. Most liberals did not vote for the Partial Birth Abortion Bill, and have set in motion to remove the bill.
...and working to take God out of the pledge of allegiance...That is true. Look at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
...and force the worst of Hollywood on the rest of America.That is true. Kerry said, while speaking to the Hollywood elite, that the "heart and soul of America" was them.
After taking a closer look, it is clear to see that these claims are not
"ridiculous, far fetched, and untrue." But rather right on que with liberals and Kerry.
QUOTE
That is true. Republican vs. Democrat. Catholic vs. Catholic. Cop vs. Criminal.
Why didn't you add the term "respectively"? That is what you are implying. So, am
I the Criminal Catholic or the Cop Catholic?

That's the problem with looking at everything from an either/or standpoint: You miss most of humanity.
QUOTE
However traditionally the value of marriage is between a man and a women. As pointed out, "just because something (ie. marriage) has been done a certain way for generations, does not make it correct." So that means that Republicans hold the value of marriage traditionally, and Democrats hold the traditional value of marriage as incorrect. The statement is true only for the Republicans to make claim against the Democrats.
How many Republican-voting couples are living together or having
sex outside of marriage? How many have said that the marriage contract is "just a piece of paper," and that it is unnecessary to stand before a minister to consecrate a union? Geez, that's not "Biblical," either. Do you think the GOP is going to reject votes from these same couples as a matter of priniciple? Or is it just homosexual unions that are being condemned here?
Might I add that there is a large group in the GOP that does
not oppose partial birth abortions?
And there are atheists in the GOP who don't give a rat's fanny about "under God" in the pledge. Remember, people, the Pledge of Allegiance existed before that clause--was it pinko or atheistic then?
QUOTE
...and force the worst of Hollywood on the rest of America.
(It seems to me Kid Rock is pro-Bush, yet he desecrated the Flag at the SuperBowl game by wearing it and then throwing it off himself...

)
That is an interesting turn of phrase, "force the worst of Hollywood" on the "rest" of America. (Thanks so much for including the Hollywood crowd among Americans!) But the last time I checked, watching television programs and movies was a voluntary action for Americans; no one is putting a gun to your head to watch this stuff. That these actors and actresses are so starved to be seen as the people they really are that they undertake some stupid stuff (e.g., Britney Spears, who supports Bush, by the way, and her strange little wedding escapades) is really out of bounds when it comes to political campaigns.
As far as Sean Penn, Jeaneane Garofalo, Barbra Streisand et al., they are demonstrating their right to free speech. And they do it with some dignity. Arnold Schwarzeneggar doesn't do that, does he? I figure he's about as "Hollywood" as they come.
I can point out Jeri Ryan's husband, a Republican, who was running ostensibly a campaign for moral values--you know, the GOP patter, until his wife exposed him for wanting her to misbehave at sex clubs...Republican values again.
Now tell me that what I have written above are lies. Does that mean that the GOP is hypocritical, too? You decide.
Damn it, we've got a war going on where over 1,000 of those whom everyone characterizes as our best and brightest have died and for what? A quagmire? And we have a President who says "Stay the course"????????
What about the real issues, people?
EITHER PRESIDENT BUSH SHOULD BE ELECTED ON HIS RECORD OR HE SHOULD NOT. If he is such a great President, why are his campaigners resorting to this kind of CRAP?----------------------------------------
(And as an aside to the Rather thing, yes, the documents were fake. But prove to me
- Bush did not actually know he received special treatment getting into the "Champagne Unit" of the Guard
- Lieutenant Bush was not grounded from flying for misbehavior or neglecting his duty
- Bush actually was serving in Alabama--that he didn't just visit the dentist there
- Bush had several buddies he served with who will come forward and speak for him
- Bush didn't miss his military physical because he was doing drugs (or booze)
- The White House isn't hiding his records for a reason
Where are the lies?)