QUOTE(Cube Jockey)
There is an interesting article in that liberal rag, otherwise know as the NY Times today concerning the cost of education.
Based on the data it provides, it would be very easy for me to make a case that much of this is Bush's fault but I don't want to go in that direction because this is bigger than the election.
At least this time you and the NY Times agree on the category of the article cited. This one appears in their "education" section as opposed to the "health" article that in fact appeared in their political section.
Be that as it may, one thing this article doesn't address is the real reason for increased tuition costs. They talk about shifts in funding sources, but I have to ask where is the money really going? Is it going to salaries for professors?

Not really, according to
The Bureau of Labor Statistics, salaries don't seem terribly out of line. From their report.....
QUOTE
Earnings for college faculty vary according to rank and type of institution, geographic area, and field. According to a 2002-03 survey by the American Association of University Professors, salaries for full-time faculty averaged $64,455. By rank, the average was $86,437 for professors, $61,732 for associate professors, $51,545 for assistant professors, $37,737 for instructors, and $43,914 for lecturers. Faculty in 4-year institutions earn higher salaries, on average, than do those in 2-year schools. In 2002-03, average faculty salaries in public institutions—$63,974—were lower than those in private independent institutions—$74,359—but higher than those in religiously affiliated private colleges and universities—$57,564. In fields with high-paying nonacademic alternatives—medicine, law, engineering, and business, among others—earnings exceed these averages. In others—such as the humanities and education—they are lower.
Many faculty members have significant earnings, in addition to their base salary, from consulting, teaching additional courses, research, writing for publication, or other employment. In addition, many college and university faculty enjoy some unique benefits, including access to campus facilities, tuition waivers for dependents, housing and travel allowances, and paid sabbatical leaves. Part-time faculty usually have fewer benefits than do full-time faculty.
Not through the roof, but not a bad gig for (according to Teresa Heinz Kerry) "not a real job". So, where is the money going? Students pay tuition, room and board, student fees and buy their own books. Based on my own college experiences, college students in their first two years at least spend most of their classroom time in lecture halls with a few hundred students for one hour three days a week and an additional hour in class with an assistant professor or TA, and they take 5-6 classes for a full load. Too lazy to do the math right now, but for that level of instruction, $5,000 in tuition alone seems pretty steep to me.
From the article cited (just to prove I read it)......
QUOTE
The survey, of nearly 2,700 colleges and universities, did not attempt to pin down the reasons for the steep increases. But among the many factors cited by its authors and other higher education experts were shrinking endowments, big increases in health insurance costs for campus employees and anemic higher education spending by states.
I wonder why this survey of "higher education experts" didn't attempt to pin down the reasons for the steep increases. It seems to me that would be a pretty important thing to identify. That money has to be going somewhere I'd think...
1. Do you believe that increasing tutition costs are a problem, and a danger to higher education access? Is there a point where the cost of higher education no longer becomes worth the salary gained? Why or why not?
They are a problem to higher education in general. They are offering a product to consumers and if they are pricing themselves out of the market they might look at where the money is going. I would agree that it is in the public interest to maintain the level of higher education in this country through such things as Pell Grants and Community Colleges, but in return I expect a full accounting of where the money is being spent.
2. The article cited is suggestive of some of the causes for increased tuition, but not specific. In your opinion, what are the causes of tuition increases?
That's the problem. I don't think "increased health care costs for campus employees" is the entire reason.
3. Based on your answer to question 2, what would you say are some possible solutions we should explore to fix the problem?Follow the money. Start treating public universities like a business and find out what they are spending their money on. If they want taxpayer's money, they owe the taxpayer a complete explanation of how they're spending it.